History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati. — John Shaqi
History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
History
History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.
Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
Water-supply -- History; Water-supply -- Ohio -- Hamilton County
2. Dr. Gunning’s experiment of the waters of the River Maas, by
reducing the turbidity with .032 gramme of perchloride of iron into
one litre of water.
3. Dr. Bischoff’s (Jr.) process of removing organic matter by
spongy iron, prepared by heating hydrated oxide of iron with carbon.
4. Spencer’s process of sand filtration with crushed grains of
a carbide of iron. The carbide, it is claimed, does not require
frequent removal.
5. Sheet-iron strips placed in water decomposes organic matter
rapidly. It is recommended by eminent authority.
6. Charcoal is, possibly, the best substance for removing organisms
chemically; but its efficiency is destroyed by an insoluble
precipitate of either lime or iron. Messrs. Adkins & Co., of
London, have patented a method to overcome this objection, by use
of charcoal plates that may be easily scraped.
_Filtration through spongy iron_ (by Rivers Pollution
Commission--Parts in 100,000 parts):
ORGANIC ORGANIC PREVIOUS
CARBON. NITROGEN. SEWAGE.
Thames water, before .120 .013 1340
Thames water, after .025 .004 10
_Filtration through animal charcoal_:
ORGANIC ORGANIC PREVIOUS
CARBON. NITROGEN. SEWAGE.
Grand Junction Co.’s water, before .164 .030 320
Grand Junction Co.’s water, after .010 .002 950
SUBSIDENCE
is the most popular method of clarification of water by the
deposition of heavy matter, accomplished in large storage reservoirs.
“If the reservoir be very small and shallow, and containing not
more than a day’s supply, for example, it is plain there can be
but little opportunity for subsidence; but even in such cases,
if the reservoir be kept full, or nearly full, the floating
impurities might never enter the circulation. In the case of a
large reservoir, holding many days’ supply, it is quite different.
Time is then afforded for the heavier impurities to settle to
the bottom; and, if the water is admitted at one end and taken
out at the other end of the reservoir, very little, if any, of
the heavier particles can pass into the circulation; and we can
see no reason why any of the superficial impurities, such as
remain on or near the surface, should ever be allowed to enter
the circulation.”--(From Water Supply Commission of Engineers,
Philadelphia, 1875.)
Fanning says:
“Subsidence does not completely clarify the water even in a
fortnight or three weeks’ time.”
London has 262 acres of subsiding reservoirs for removing the
turbidity of the Thames and Lea Rivers, and used as storage at times
of sudden freshets.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account