History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
The particular statement of the two missionaries Oftebro, concerning
the translation of newspapers, also Mr. Colenso specially and
distinctly contradicts, saying that he had no newspapers with him nor
extracts of newspapers, nor were any such read to Cetshwayo in his
presence.
Sir H. Bulwer states, at the request of the Messrs. Oftebro (2100,
p. 61), that no member of the Norwegian mission had supplied this
Government with information as above. But it does not follow that
no such communications had been made to Sir B. Frere and Lord
Carnarvon. Missionaries had written anonymously to the colonial
papers, and the account in _The Natal Mercury_ of the fight at the
Umkosi was attributed by Cetshwayo, not without reason, to the Rev.
E. Robertson. The tone of this letter, and its _accuracy_, may be
gathered from the following extract, referring to the land which,
in the opinion of the Commissioners, “was by right belonging to the
Zulus.”
“Never was a more preposterous demand made upon any Government than
that which Cetshwayo is now making upon the English Government of
the Transvaal.... For be it remembered that, until very lately, the
Zulus have never occupied any portion of it, (!) and even now very
partially. It is most earnestly to be hoped that Sir T. Shepstone,
while doing all in his power to keep the peace, _will be equally firm
in resisting the unjust pretensions of the Zulus_.”[101]
How far the Zulu king was justified in his opinion that the
missionaries were not his friends may be gathered from the above, and
from the replies to Sir B. Frere’s appeal to the “missionaries of all
denominations” for their opinions on native politics, as published in
the Blue-books (2316), of which the following examples may be given:
From letter of the Rev. P. D. Hepburn, December 17th, 1878: “All
in these parts are quiet, and are likely to remain quiet, if His
Excellency overthrows the Zulu chief, and disarms the remaining
Zulus. The Zulus are very warlike; will attack in front, flank, and
rear. They are, and have been, the terror of the neighbouring tribes
since the days of Chaka.[102] Only the utter destruction of the Zulus
can secure future peace in South Africa. May His Excellency not allow
himself to be deceived by the Zulu chief Cetywayo.”
“On full inquiry it will be found that our late war, (Kaffraria)
here was to a great extent attributable to Zulu influence.[103] If
our forces suffer defeat at Natal, all native tribes in South Africa
will rise against us. I am a man of peace; I hate war; but if war,
let there be no dawdling and sentimental nonsense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account