History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
“True and faithful to God, our Queen, and the interests of the
empire, we have the approbation of God, our Queen, and our own
conscience. I would have much liked had there been a regiment of
British cavalry at Natal. Sword in hand, the British are irresistible
over all natives. The battle at the Gwanga in 1846, under Sir Henry
Darrell, lasted only about fifteen minutes; about four hundred Kafirs
were cut down....
“God, our God, put it into the minds of our rulers that all tribes in
south-east and east Africa must submit to British power, and that it
is the interest of all Africans to do so. Heathenism must perish; God
wills it so.”[104]
These remarks are from a missionary in Kaffraria, but the tone of
these in Zululand is the same, or even worse. Compare the following
statement made to the Natal Government by two native converts from
the Etshowe mission station—Mr. Oftebro’s (1883, p. 2): “We know that
as many a hundred (Zulus) in one day see the sun rise, but don’t see
it go down.... The people, great and small, are tired of the rule
of Cetshwayo, by which he is finishing his people. The Zulu army is
not what it was, there are only six full regiments. Cetshwayo had
by his rule made himself so disliked, that they knew of no one, and
especially of the headmen, who would raise a hand to save him from
ruin, no matter from what cause.”
Mr. John Shepstone adds, April 27th, 1877 (p. 4): “The above was
confirmed only yesterday by reliable authority, who added that a
power such as the English, stepping in now, would be most welcome to
the Zulus generally, through the unpopularity of the king, by his
cruel and reckless treatment of his subjects.” And Mr. Fynney, in the
report already quoted from, says:
“The king appeared to have a very exaggerated idea both of his
power, the number of his warriors, and their ability as such....
While speaking of the king as having exaggerated ideas as to the
number of his fighting-men, I would not wish to be understood as
underrating the power of the Zulu nation.... I am of opinion that
King Cetywayo could bring six thousand men into the field at a short
notice, great numbers armed with guns; but the question is, would
they fight?... I am of opinion that it would greatly depend against
whom they were called to fight.... While the Zulu nation, to a man,
would have willingly turned out to fight either the Boers or the
Ama-Swazi, the case would be very different, I believe, in the event
of a misunderstanding arising between the British Government and the
Zulu nation.... I further believe, from what I heard, that a quarrel
with the British Government would be the signal for a general split
up amongst the Zulus, and the king would find himself deserted by the
majority of those upon whom he would at present appear to rely.”
While Sir T. Shepstone says, November 30th, 1878 (2222, p. 175): “I
will, however, add my belief that the Zulu power is likely to fall to
pieces when touched.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account