History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
Such were the opinions given by men supposed to be intimately
acquainted with Zulu character and feeling, one of them being _the_
great authority on all native matters; and on such statements did
Sir Bartle Frere rely when he laid his scheme for the Zulu War.
How absolutely ignorant, how foolishly mistaken, were these “blind
leaders of the blind” has been amply proved by the events of 1879.
We need not enter very fully into the accusations brought by the
missionaries against the Zulu king of indiscriminate slaughter of
native converts for their religion’s sake. They were thoroughly
believed in Natal at the time; but, upon investigation, they dwindled
down to three separate cases of the execution of men (one in each
case) who happened to be converts, but of whom two were put to death
for causes which had nothing whatsoever to do with their faith (one
of them being indeed a relapsed convert); and the third, an old
man, Maqamsela, whose name certainly deserves to be handed down to
fame in the list of martyrs for religion’s sake, was killed without
the sanction or even knowledge of the king, by the order of his
prime minister Gaozi.[105] That the latter received no punishment,
although the king disapproved of this action, is not a fact of any
importance. It is not always convenient to punish prime ministers and
high commissioners, or powerful indunas.
Sir Bartle Frere of course takes the strongest possible view of
the matter against the king, and speaks of his having killed Zulu
converts (2220, p. 270), “at first rarely, as if with reluctance,
and a desire to conceal what he had ordered, and to shift the
responsibility to other shoulders, latterly more frequently, openly,
and as an avowed part of a general policy for re-establishing the
system of Chaka and Dingane.” This little phrase is of a slightly
imaginative nature, resting on no (produced) evidence. It is, in
fact, a “statement.”[106]
Sir Henry Bulwer’s reply—November 18th, 1878 (2222, p. 171)—which
forms an able refutation of various statements of Sir B. Frere,
contains the following sentence: “I took some pains to find out how
the case really stood, and ascertained that the number of natives,
either converts or living on mission stations, who had been killed,
was _three_. I have never heard since that time of any other mission
natives being killed.... I was, therefore, surprised, on reading
your Excellency’s despatch, to see what Messrs. Oftebro and Staven
had said. I have since made particular inquiries on that point, but
have failed to obtain any information showing that more than _three_
mission natives have been killed. Among others to whom I have spoken
is the Rev. Mr. Robertson, of Zululand, who was in ’Maritzburg a few
weeks ago. He told me that he had not heard of any other than the
_three_ cases.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account