History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
On the 11th, the General writes: “Both Colonel Wood and Major Russell
took a good number of Sirayo’s cattle this morning, which we found
quietly grazing along our line of advance.” And again: “Several
hundred head of cattle, etc. were taken by Nos. 3 and 4 Columns
on the 11th. This I considered desirable on political grounds, as
they all belonged to Usirayo, as well as from military necessities”
(_ibid._ pp. 43-46). It is rather difficult to reconcile this
commencement of operations with the words “The British Government
has no quarrel with the Zulu people;” or with the General’s message
to the Zulu king (through Mr. Fynney, Border Agent, and the Zulu
messengers Sintwangu and Umpepa, December 29th, 1878) ... “if all
the demands are not complied with the troops will advance. That such
advance will not be directed against the Zulu nation, but against the
King....”—(P. P. [C. 2308] p. 39).
On the 12th January, No. 3 Column first came into contact with the
Zulus. The General made a reconnaissance in the Bashi Valley and
towards Izipezi Hill. Sihayo’s people were seen driving the cattle
to the shelter of the hills, “as, however,” the General says, “it is
well known that we had made a distinct demand for the punishment of
the sons of this chief, and that his clan was one of the bravest and
most warlike of the Zulu nation, I considered it very desirable to
punish them at once by capturing their cattle.”
The Ingqutu Mountain was occupied by infantry, when “a fire was
opened upon them by the Zulus, who were occupying very strong
positions in the caves and rocks above.” An officer present states
that the actual first shot was from the side of the British, but
this is not of great importance, as it is impossible to imagine the
Zulus could have been expected to look calmly on, whilst their cattle
were being captured. After about half-an-hour’s fight the cattle and
horses were taken. The mounted force was likewise engaged higher up
the mountain. Our loss, 2 Native Contingent killed and 12 wounded.
The loss inflicted on the enemy, 30 killed, 4 wounded, and 10
prisoners; the cattle, etc. taken, 13 horses, 413 cattle, 332 goats,
and 235 sheep.—(P. P. [C. 2242] pp. 47, 48).
These first steps in Zululand have been given in considerable detail,
as they afford much food for reflection on the contrast between
“words” and “deeds.”
CHAPTER XIII.
ISANDHLWANA.
Having crossed into Zululand, the “difficulties ... in the way of
those who are endeavouring to move forward into an enemy’s country,
over tracts which have never been traversed, except by a very few
traders’ waggons,”[121] began to declare themselves; and Lord
Chelmsford remarks, January 16th: “No. 3 Column at Rorke’s Drift
cannot possibly move forward even eight miles until two swamps, into
which our waggons sank up to the body, have been made passable. This
work will occupy us for at least four days, and we shall find similar
obstacles in front of us in every march we are anxious to make.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account