History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
These, indeed, were ample explanations for the fact of the dispersion
of the 3rd Regiment Natal Native Contingent, but they were followed
by many and serious complaints, made by the men and reported by the
magistrates, of the manner in which the former had been treated
since the campaign began. These complaints comprised insufficiency
of food, floggings for disobedience to orders which they had either
never heard, or had not understood, and bad officers.[155] These were
the most important items, the rest referring to their preference for
their own methods of fighting, to which, as we have already shown,
there were the strongest objections.
These reports referred solely to the contingent attached to Colonel
Glyn’s column, with the exception of one, which was concerning the
remnant of the Zikali men, escaped from Isandhlwana.
It was finally decided that the men of the contingents belonging to
No. 1 Column might “be allowed to leave in batches, but they must be
made to understand that they are required for the defence of Natal.”
(P. P. [C. 2260] p. 22.) The contingent forming No. 2 Column remained
steadily serving throughout the war. Major Bengough’s battalion had a
narrow escape of sharing in the disaster of Isandhlwana, and the men
were somewhat shaken and disheartened at seeing the contingent of No.
3 Column dispersing; but this ill-effect soon passed away.
Colonel Pearson’s remarks on the company of Native Pioneers belonging
to his column are concise and valuable. He says: “The men worked
cheerfully. They had eyes like hawks, and they did all their scouting
to perfection. It convinced me that the Natal Zulus, under proper
management, would make excellent troops.”
CHAPTER XV.
THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST SIKUKUNI.
We have already, in a previous chapter, explained the circumstances
which led to the war between the Transvaal Boers and Sikukuni,
independent chief of a mixed race of natives commonly called the
_Makatisi_, more properly the _Bapedi_, tribe. The immediate cause
of the war was a border dispute between some of the gradually
encroaching Boer farmers and the natives whom they had displaced,
which ended in the latter taking possession of some cattle belonging
to the former.
This affair took place during a temporary absence of Mr. Burgers
(then President of the Republic), who, on his return, demanded the
cattle at the hands of Sikukuni, and the restraint of his people
within the limits assigned to them by their Boer neighbours. Sikukuni
expressed his willingness to make the required restitution, but took
the opportunity of reminding the President that he laid claim to a
considerable piece of territory already occupied by Boers, to whom
he denied having ever willingly relinquished it. This reply was the
signal for a declaration of war against Sikukuni on the part of the
President and Volksraad, and a large “commando,” or volunteer force,
was called out to attack him early in July, 1876.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account