History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
On the 20th, 23rd, and 26th June the burial of the remainder of those
who fell at Isandhlwana was completed by a force under the command
of Lieut.-Colonel Black, 24th Regiment. He carefully noted the signs
of the fight, and reported that the bodies of the slain lay thickest
in the 1-24th camp, in which 130 dead lay (in two distinct spots),
with their officers, Captain Wardell, Lieutenant Dyer, and a captain
and a subaltern not recognisable; close to the place where the bodies
of Colonel Durnford, Lieutenant Scott, and other Carbineers, and men
of the Natal Mounted Police were found. This is described as being a
“centre of resistance,” as the bodies of men of all arms were found
converging as it were to the spot. About sixty bodies, with those of
Captain Younghusband and two other officers, lay in a group under the
southern precipice of Isandhlwana, as if they had held the crags and
fought till ammunition failed. The proofs of hand-to-hand fighting
were frequent. The fugitives’ track, too, told its tale: “Here and
there around a waggon, here and there around a tree, a group had
formed and stood at bay; shoulder to shoulder they fired their last
cartridge, and shoulder to shoulder they plied the steel; side by
side their bones are lying and tell the tale.”
Eight hundred yards from the road the guns had come upon ground no
wheels could pass, and from here the bodies were more and more apart
till, about two miles from camp, the last one lies and marks the
limit reached by white men on foot.
The fatal trail again began near the river’s bank, where Major Smith,
R.A., and others rest, a river’s breadth from Natal; across the river
it runs until the graves of Melville and Coghill nearly mark its end.
_The Standard and Mail_ of September 16th says: “It is a noticeable
fact that Cetywayo declares that his men were completely disheartened
by Isandula, and that as a matter of fact he was never able to get
them thoroughly together again after that event. He says that a large
part of the forces engaged on that occasion were actually retreating
when another part made the fatal rush.... Of course these statements
are of interest as showing what Cetywayo said, but they must be
accepted with reservation, as he has throughout taken up the theory
that he and his men had no intention of inflicting so much injury
upon us as they did.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account