History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
As regards the Zulu loss, Lord Chelmsford says: “It is impossible to
estimate with any correctness the loss of the enemy, owing to the
extent of country over which they attacked and retreated; but it
could not have been less, I consider, than 1000 killed.”—(Despatch,
4th July).
Using the same reasoning on the 6th, Lord Chelmsford says: “But
judging by the reports of those engaged, it cannot be placed at a
less number than 1500 killed.”
From the statements of prisoners it would seem that the attacking
force was about 15,000 strong, 5000 being in reserve. At a meeting
of the Zulu Council on the 2nd July, it appears that it was resolved
by the King to send in the royal coronation white cattle as a
peace-offering; but as they were being driven towards the English
camp on the 2nd, they were turned back at Nodwengo by the Umcityu
Regiment, who refused to let them pass, saying, as they could not
fulfil all the demands, it was useless to give up the cattle, and
therefore they would fight. The king was then at Ulundi; he said that
“as the Inkandampemvu (Umcityu) Regiment would not let the cattle go
in as a peace-offering, and as we wished to fight, the white army
being now at his home, we could fight, but we were to fight the white
men in the open, and attack before the Nodwengo and Ulundi kraals,
where we were on the day of the fight.... The army is now thoroughly
beaten, and as it was beaten in the open, it will not reassemble and
fight again. No force is watching the lower column, and none has been
sent there. How could there be, when all were ordered to be here
to-day? We mustered here by the king’s orders at the beginning of
this moon, about ten days ago. We have not been called out before.”
The natives belonging to the British force were exceedingly struck at
the idea of their being brought into the square, whilst the soldiers
formed “a laager” of their bodies round them.
The special correspondent of _The Daily News_, Mr. Archibald Forbes,
performed a very gallant act after the battle of Ulundi. Finding
that no despatch was being sent off by the General to announce the
victory, he determined to take the news himself, and, “taking his
life in his hand,” set out alone to ride right through the Zulu
country. This he did, riding the whole night, having frequently to
dismount and actually _feel_ his way—the tracks of the waggons on the
upward route.
Next day, after a ride of nearly a hundred miles, he reached
Landtmann’s Drift (in fifteen hours), and was enabled to telegraph to
Sir Garnet Wolseley the news of the victory of the 4th.
A few brief remarks on the return march are all that are necessary.
The day after the battle of Ulundi (5th July) the whole force retired
to Entonjaneni, and remained there till the 9th, when the Flying
Column moved on the road towards the coast to Kwamagwasa, _en route_
to meet Sir Garnet Wolseley.
On the 10th the 2nd Division marched from Entonjaneni, and arrived at
the Upoko River on the 15th.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account