History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
Sir Garnet Wolseley completed the chain of forts across Zululand,
commencing with St. Paul’s, an English mission station on the coast
road a little north of where it crosses the Umlatusi. Fifteen miles
west of this is Kwamagwasa. Twenty miles a little south of west lies
Fort Evelyn, on the road from Rorke’s Drift to Ulundi. Fort Marshall
about twenty miles west-south-west of Fort Evelyn, Fort Newdigate,
twelve miles north-west of Fort Evelyn, and a fort on Itelezi Hill
completes the chain to the Blood River. Some of these forts were
constructed on the upward march of the 2nd Division and Flying
Column, to keep open their communications. In addition to these,
Fort Cambridge was built near where the road from Conference Hill
crosses the White Umvolosi; and a little later an entrenched post
(Fort George) was thrown up near Enhlongana mission station, thus
thoroughly, by these detached posts, commanding the country.
Patrols were pushed out in various directions, by one of which
the two guns lost at Isandhlwana were found between Ulundi and
Maizekanye. They had not been spiked, but the Zulus had screwed
rifle-nipples into the vents, and had also apparently tried to load
the guns by ramming home shells, but without cartridges.
The Cavalry Brigade was broken up, and a fresh disposition of the
troops made. Sir Garnet visited various posts, interviewing the Zulu
chiefs who had surrendered themselves. Some of the most important,
however, of those who came in, and were supposed to have submitted
and deserted their king, had, in point of fact, no such intention,
appearing merely to make their often and vainly repeated attempt at
procuring “terms” for Cetshwayo and themselves. It had always been
prophesied that the Zulu nation would desert their king. Before the
war began, some of those who professed to understand the people best,
declared that they would be thankful to throw off the yoke of one
whom, it was alleged, they regarded with fear and hatred, and would
side with the English as soon as the latter crossed their border.
The fallacy of this idea was discovered to our cost.
It was then asserted that the Zulu army had given a temporary
strength to the authority of their king, which would last until we
had beaten his troops and proved our superiority, and this assertion
was used by those who insisted that no peace must be made, however
earnestly desired by the Zulus, until we had beaten them and shown
them that we were their masters.
After Ulundi, it was argued that the people would be glad to procure
peace by giving up their king, whose unconditional submission, or
capture, was announced by us to be the only possible conclusion to
the war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account