History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
“If they wished to do so there is nothing to prevent them, and never
has been. As they march, they could march from their border to this
city or to Durban in a little more than twenty-four hours. Their only
fear is, that the English will come with an army ‘to make them pay
taxes.’ They say they will rather die than do so. The king says the
same. Almost every man has a gun. Guns and ammunition are cheaper at
any military kraal in Zululand than at Port Natal. These goods are
imported by Tonga men, who come in large gangs from Delagoa Bay, for
white merchants. An Enfield rifle may be had for a sheep of a Tonga
man; many have breech-loaders. The missionaries, whose principal
occupation was trading, deal in ammunition. The missionaries have
recently lost most of their converts, who have gone trading on their
own account. Without these converts the missionaries cannot do
business, and they have left the country, except Bishop Schreuder,
who has gone back, that it may not be said that a white man is not
safe there. Cetewayo says that he has asked the missionaries to stop.
They have certainly not been turned out or threatened. Their going
makes the Zulus think that we are about to invade the country.
“Nothing but gross mismanagement will bring about a quarrel between
England and the Zulus.”—(P. P. [C. 2144] pp. 215, 216).
[78] This is apparently a figure of speech, since Luneburg, near
which the kraal was being built, would seem by the map _not_ to
lie “to the rear”—as seen from Zululand—of Utrecht, where Sir T.
Shepstone was staying.
[79] Compare the account of the delay on the part of the Boer
Government when Mr. Keate proposed to arbitrate. See last chapter, p.
182.
[80] 2144, p. 191.
[81] The Zulus, of course, would not have appreciated the convenience
of a table and chairs; they had no “documents” to lay upon the
former; and their opinion of the comfort of the latter is best
expressed by the well-known Zulu saying that, “_Only Englishmen
and chickens sit upon perches._” The mats provided for them were,
therefore, a proper equivalent to the tables and seats placed for the
other delegates.
[82] Sir Bartle Frere gives a very unfair account of this
matter-of-course fact when he transmits to the Secretary of State
the above despatch, “informing me of the incomplete result, in
consequence of the attitude of Cetshwayo’s representatives at the
Commission of Inquiry.”
[83] The king’s kraal at that time.
[84] The homestead specially spoken of in this case does not appear
to have been destroyed or injured till March, 1879, in the midst of
the war, nor was any human being, white or black, belonging to these
farms, killed by this “savage, unbridled, revengeful nation,” before
the war began.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account