History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
[85] Apparently by Sir T. Shepstone’s orders, as the following phrase
appears in one of the Boer protests against arbitration, April 25th,
1873: “The majority of the people have, by order of your Excellency,
trekked into laager on December 14th last, and after having remained
in laager for nearly five months, _we are to go and live on our farms
again_.”
[86] The married women work in the mealie-gardens, etc., and the
_little_ girls carry the babies; but the marriageable young women
seem to have an interval of happy freedom from all labour and care.
[87] This was comprehensible during the attempt, which proved so
signal a failure, on the part of Sir T. Shepstone, to impose a
_marriage tax_ upon the natives. The tax was so extremely unpopular
that it was thought advisable to relinquish it, and to make the
desired increase in the revenue of the colony by doubling the hut-tax.
[88] Sir T. Shepstone, when he says (1137, p. 18) “Natal gives up the
_cattle_ of Zulu refugees.... The refugees themselves are not given
up,” plainly includes women amongst the cattle or “property” of the
Zulus.
[89] And later, Nov. 18, 1878 (2222, p. 173), he says: “I do not
hold the King responsible for the commission of the act, because
there is nothing to show that it had his previous concurrence or
even cognizance. But he becomes responsible for the act after its
commission, and for such reparation as we may consider is due for it.”
[90] Since rifled by our troops, and the bones of the old king
brought over to England.
[91] No “demand” was made until it appeared in Sir B. Frere’s
ultimatum.
[92] On perusing the above italicised words, one learns for the first
time that the ultimatum, which Sir Bartle Frere sent to the Zulu king
a few months later, was actually sent for the express purpose of
putting “an end to pacific relations with our neighbours.” This is
hardly the light in which the British public has been taught to look
upon the matter.
[93] Mr. H. Shepstone (Secretary for Native Affairs in the Transvaal)
acknowledges that this fine was paid (2222, p. 99).
[94] Manyonyoba owed allegiance to Cetshwayo (as did Umbilini). He
lived north of the Pongolo, in a part of the country over which
Sir Bartle Frere and Sir Henry Bulwer altogether deny Cetshwayo’s
supremacy, and was claimed as a subject of the Transvaal Government.
[95] Sir H. Bulwer says “they have suspected, quite wrongly, that
we had some design against them in making it” (the new road to the
drift). It is to be questioned how far their suspicion was a wrongful
one, seeing that it was understood from the first that the drift
was intended especially for military purposes, and was undoubtedly
inspected by Mr. Smith for the same.
[96] Quotations from Mr. Deighton’s report to Mr. Wheelwright.
[97] Words applied to him by Mr. Brownlee, late Secretary for Native
Affairs of the Cape Government.
[98] Author’s italics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account