History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
The chief was kept in solitary confinement from the day when he was
brought down to Pietermaritzburg, December 31st, till the day when
his sons were sentenced, February 27th; not being allowed to converse
with any of his sons, or with any members of his tribe, or with any
friend or adviser, white or black. It was therefore quite out of his
power to find witnesses who would have shown, as Mnyembe and Gayede
would have done, that Mawiza’s statements about the “stripping” were
false; that he still wore his waistcoat, shirt, trousers, boots, and
gaiters, when he was taken to the chief; and that the “stripping”
in question only amounted to this, that he himself put off his two
coats, by the chiefs orders, “as a matter of precaution caused by
fear” and not for the purpose of insulting the messenger, or defying
the Supreme Chief. They would have satisfied the court also that
other acts charged against the prisoner arose from fear, and dread of
the Supreme Chief, and not from a spirit of defiance.
This affair of the messenger, explained by fear and suspicion on the
part of Langalibalele, by which, also, he accounted for his refusal
to “appear before” the Supreme Chief (which is to say that, being
desired to give himself up into the hands of the Government, he was
afraid to do so, and ran away), was the turning-point of the whole
trial. What special reason he had for that fear and distrust will
be inquired into shortly. Meanwhile the court considered that such
expressed distrust of the good faith of the authorities was an added
offence on the part of the prisoner, who was formally condemned to
death, but his sentence commuted to banishment for life to Robben
Island, the abode of lunatics and lepers, in which other captive
native chiefs had languished and died before him.[25]
CHAPTER IV.
THE BISHOP’S DEFENCE.
The daily accounts of the trial which appeared in the local papers
were read with great interest and attention by the Bishop, who
quickly discerned the injustice of the proceedings. Mawiza’s manifest
contradiction of his own evidence first attracted his attention, and
led to his hearing from some of his own natives what was not allowed
to appear at the trial, that Mawiza’s story was entirely false.
Seeing how seriously this fact bore upon the prisoner’s case, he went
to Mr. Shepstone and told him what he had heard.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account