History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
It was some time before the Transvaalers recovered from the stunning
effects of the blow by which they had been deprived of their
liberties, and meanwhile the new Government made rapid advances, and
vigorous attempts at winning popularity amongst the people. Sir T.
Shepstone hastened to fill up every office under him with his own
men, although there were great flourishes of trumpets concerning
preserving the rights of the people to the greatest extent possible,
and keeping the original men in office wherever practicable. The
first stroke by which popularity was aimed at was that of remitting
the war taxes levied upon the white population (though unpaid)
to meet the expenses of the war with Sikukuni. It became apparent
at this point what an empty sham was our proposed protection of
Sikukuni, and how little the oppression under which he and his people
suffered had really called forth our interference. Sir T. Shepstone,
while remitting, as stated, the tax upon the Boers, insisted upon the
payment in full of the fine in cattle levied by them upon Sikukuni’s
people. So sternly did he carry out the very oppressions which he
came to put an end to, that a portion of the cattle paid towards
the fine (two thousand head, a large number, in the reduced and
impoverished state of the people) were sent back, by his orders, on
the grounds that they were too small and in poor condition, with the
accompanying message that better ones must be sent in their place. A
commission (composed of Captain Clarke, R.A., and Mr. Osborne) was
sent, before the annexation, by Sir T. Shepstone, to inquire into a
treaty pressed by the Boers upon Sikukuni, and rejected by him, as
it contained a condition by which he was to pay taxes, and thereby
come under the Transvaal Government.[61] To these gentlemen “Sikukuni
stated that the English were great and he was little [C. 1776, p.
147], that he wanted them to save him from the Boers, who hunted him
to and fro, and shot his people down like wild game. He had lost
two thousand men” (this included those who submitted to the Boers)
“by the war, ten brothers, and four sons.... He could not trust
the Boers as they were always deceiving him.” After saying that “he
wished to be like Moshesh” (a British subject), and be “happy and at
peace,” he “asked whether he ought to pay the two thousand head of
cattle, seeing that the war was not of his making.”
“To this we replied,” say the Commissioners, “that it was the custom
of us English, when we made an engagement, to fulfil it, cost what it
might; that our word was our word.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account