History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
Small wonder if the oppressed and persecuted people and their chief
at last resented such treatment, or that some of them should have
shown that resentment in a manner decided enough to call for military
proceedings on the part of the new Government of the Transvaal.
In point of fact, however, it was not Sikukuni, but his sister—a
chieftainess herself—whose people, by a quarrel with and raid upon
natives living under our protection, brought on the second or English
“Sikukuni war.”
Turning to the other chief pretext for the annexation of the
Transvaal, the disturbed condition of the Zulu border, we find
precisely the same policy carried out. When it was first announced
that the English had taken possession of the country of their
enemies, the Zulus, figuratively speaking, threw up their caps, and
rejoiced greatly. They thought that now at last, after years of
patient waiting, and painful repression of angry feelings at the
desire of the Natal Government, they were to receive their reward in
a just acknowledgment of the claims which Sir T. Shepstone had so
long supported, and which he was now in a position to confirm.
But the quiet submission of the Boers would not have lasted, even
upon the surface, had their new Governor shown the slightest sign
of leaning to the Zulu side on the bitter boundary question; and as
Sir T. Shepstone fancied that the power of his word was great enough
with the Zulus to make them submit, however unwillingly, there was
small chance of their receiving a rood of land at his hands. He had
lost sight of, or never comprehended the fact, that that power was
built upon the strong belief which existed in the minds of the Zulu
king and people with regard to the justice and honesty of the English
Government. This feeling is amply illustrated by the messages from
the Zulu king, quoted in our chapter upon the Disputed Territory, and
elsewhere in this volume, and need therefore only be alluded to here.
But this belief, so far as Sir T. Shepstone is concerned, was
destroyed when the Zulus found that, far from acting according to his
often-repeated words, their quondam friend had turned against them,
and espoused the cause of their enemies, whom, at his desire, they
had refrained these many years from attacking, when they could have
done so without coming into collision with the English.
The Zulus, indeed, still believed in the English, and in the Natal
Government; but they considered that Sir T. Shepstone, in undertaking
the government of the Boers, had become a Boer himself, or, as
Cetshwayo himself said, his old friend and father’s back, which
had carried him so long, had become too rough for him—if he could
carry him no longer he would get down, and go to a man his equal
in Pietermaritzburg (meaning Sir Henry Bulwer, Lieut.-Governor of
Natal), who would be willing and able to take him up.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account