Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
Accordingly, women tested their right, registered and voted--the
inspectors of election accepting the argument, for which
inspectors and women alike were arrested, tried and punished; the
courts deciding that although by the fourteenth amendment they
were citizens, still, citizenship did not carry with it the right
to vote. But granting the premise of the Supreme Court decision,
"that the constitution does not confer suffrage on any one," then
it inhered with the citizen before the constitution was framed.
Our national life does not date from that instrument. The
constitution is not the original declaration of rights. It was
not framed until eleven years after our existence as a nation,
nor fully ratified until nearly fourteen years after the
inauguration of our national independence.
But however the letter and spirit of the constitution may be
interpreted by the people, the judiciary of the nation has
uniformly proved itself the echo of the party in power. When the
slave power was dominant the Supreme Court decided that a black
man was not a citizen, because he had not the right to vote; and
when the constitution was so amended as to make all persons
citizens, the same high tribunal decided that a woman, though a
citizen, had not the right to vote. An African, by virtue of his
United States citizenship, is declared, under recent amendments,
a voter in every State of the Union; but when a woman, by virtue
of her United States citizenship, applies to the Supreme Court
for protection in the exercise of this same right, she is
remanded to the State, by the unanimous decision of the nine
judges on the bench, that "the Constitution of the United States
does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one." Such
vacillating interpretations of constitutional law must unsettle
our faith in judicial authority, and undermine the liberties of
the whole people. Seeing by these decisions of the courts that
the theory of our government, the Declaration of Independence,
and recent constitutional amendments, have no significance for
woman, that all the grand principles of equality are glittering
generalities for her, we must fall back once more to our former
demand of a sixteenth amendment to the federal constitution,
that, in clear, unmistakable language, shall declare the status
of woman in this republic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account