History of Zionism, 1600-1918, Vol. 2 (of 2)Sokolow, Nahum
History
History of Zionism, 1600-1918, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Sokolow, Nahum
Jews -- Restoration; Zionism -- History
SWAYTHLING ISRAEL GOLLANCZ
CHAS. S. HENRY MICHAEL A. GREEN
MATTHEW NATHAN H. S. Q. HENRIQUES
LIONEL ABRAHAMS¹ JOSHUA M. LEVY
ISIDORE SPIELMANN LAURIE MAGNUS
EDWARD D. STERN EDMUND SEBAG-MONTEFIORE
ISRAEL ABRAHAMS ARTHUR REGINALD MORO
LEONARD L. COHEN PHILIP S. WALEY
ERNEST L. FRANKLIN ALBERT M. WOOLF
“_May 29th._”
¹ “Sir Lionel Abrahams signs subject to the opinion that,
in view of the statement made by the President of the
English Zionist Federation on May 20, a further attempt at
co-operation between the Conjoint Committee and the Zionist
organisations in the United Kingdom is now desirable.”
There were soon widespread signs that the congregations supposed to
be represented by the Board of Deputies did not agree with the views
expressed in the manifesto. Thus the seatholders of the New Synagogue,
Stamford Hill, carried a motion calling upon their representatives
at the Board of Deputies and the Conjoint Committee to resign. This
was passed with only two dissentients. Synagogues in Manchester and
Liverpool and the Committee of Deputies in Manchester, Yorkshire and
Cheshire expressed regret at the action of the President of the Board
of Deputies in “committing the Board to a policy for which the Board
has given him no kind of authority.” The Belfast Congregation passed
a similar resolution and also expressed confidence in Dr. Weizmann and
the Zionist movement. Congregations in Birkenhead, Cardiff, Dublin,
Edinburgh, Glasgow, Limerick, Merthyr Tydvil, Middlesbrough, Newcastle,
Newport (Mon.), Swansea and Wallasey took similar action. In Leeds
a meeting was held representative of all the Jewish congregations
and organizations; in Manchester the Jewish representative Council
condemned the action of the Conjoint Committee. Indeed, throughout
the United Kingdom Synagogues, Friendly Societies, Jewish Charitable
Organizations and nearly every kind of Jewish institution made a public
protest against the Manifesto, and declared in favour of Zionism.
These widespread signs of dissatisfaction with the existing leadership
of the body which had hitherto claimed to be the official spokesman for
Jewish opinion in England, was destined to lead to a complete change of
government in that body.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account