Of words that seem to have been admitted to full franchise, we may give examples in _curry_, _toddy_, _veranda_, _cheroot_, _loot_, _nabob_, _teapoy_, _sepoy_, _cowry_; and of others familiar enough to the English ear, though hardly yet received into citizenship, _compound_, _batta_, _pucka_, _chowry_, _baboo_, _mahout_, _aya_, _nautch_,[5] first-_chop_, competition-_wallah_, _griffin_, &c. But beyond these two classes of words, received within the last century or so, and gradually, into half or whole recognition, there are a good many others, long since fully assimilated, which really originated in the adoption of an Indian word, or the modification of an Indian proper name. Such words are the three quoted at the beginning of these remarks, _chintz_, _calico_, _gingham_, also _shawl_, _bamboo_, _pagoda_, _typhoon_, _monsoon_, _mandarin_, _palanquin_,[6] &c., and I may mention among further examples which may perhaps surprise my readers, the names of three of the boats of a man-of-war, viz. the _cutter_, the _jolly-boat_, and the _dingy_, as all (probably) of Indian origin.[7] Even phrases of a different character—slang indeed, but slang generally supposed to be vernacular as well as vulgar—_e.g._ 'that is the _cheese_';[7] or supposed to be vernacular and profane—_e.g._ 'I don't care a _dam_'[7]—are in reality, however vulgar they may be, neither vernacular nor profane, but phrases turning upon innocent Hindustani vocables. We proposed also, in our Glossary, to deal with a _selection_ of those administrative terms, which are in such familiar and quotidian use as to form part of the common Anglo-Indian stock, and to trace all (so far as possible) to their true origin—a matter on which, in regard to many of the words, those who hourly use them are profoundly ignorant—and to follow them down by quotation from their earliest occurrence in literature. A particular class of words are those indigenous terms which have been adopted in scientific nomenclature, botanical and zoological. On these Mr. Burnell remarks:— "The first Indian botanical names were chiefly introduced by Garcia de Orta (_Colloquios_, printed at Goa in 1563), C. d'Acosta (_Tractado_, Burgos, 1578), and Rhede van Drakenstein (_Hortus Malabaricus_, Amsterdam, 1682). The Malay names were chiefly introduced by Rumphius (_Herbarium Amboinense_, completed before 1700, but not published till 1741). The Indian zoological terms were chiefly due to Dr. F. Buchanan, at the beginning of this century. Most of the N. Indian botanical words were introduced by Roxburgh."