Hogarth's Works, with life and anecdotal descriptions of his pictures. Volume 3 (of 3)Ireland, John
General
Hogarth's Works, with life and anecdotal descriptions of his pictures. Volume 3 (of 3)
Ireland, John
Hogarth, William, 1697-1764
Notwithstanding this pleasantry preceding the publication, he
frankly acknowledges that the uncharitable spirit with which he was
in consequence assailed, and the squabbles it drew him into with
those of his own profession, and the dabblers in the arts, gave him
greater uneasiness than was balanced by its general success. Thus
does he express himself:--
"My preface and introduction to the _Analysis_ contain a general
explanation of the circumstances which led me to commence
author; but this has not deterred my opponents from loading me
with much gross and, I think, unmerited obloquy; it therefore
becomes necessary that I should try to defend myself from their
aspersions.
"Among many other high crimes and misdemeanours of which I am
accused, it is asserted that I have abused the great masters.
This is so far from being just, that when the truth is fairly
stated it may possibly appear that the professional reputation
of these luminaries of the arts is more injured by the wild
and enthusiastic admiration of those who denominate themselves
their fast friends, than by men who are falsely classed as their
enemies.
"Let us put a case: suppose a brilliant landscape had been so
finely painted by a first-rate artist, that the trees, water,
sky, etc. were boldly though tenderly relieved from each other,
and the eye of the spectator might, as it were, travel into
the scenery; and suppose this landscape, by the heat of the
sun, the ravages of time, or the still more fatal ravages of
picture-cleaners, was shorn of its beams and deprived of all its
original brightness; let me ask whether the man who will affirm
that this almost obliterated, unharmonious, spotty, patchwork
piece of antiquity is in the state that it first came out of the
artist's hands, does not abuse the painter?[52] and whether he
who asserts that though it might once have been bright and clear
it is now faded, does not thus place the defects to the proper
account, and consequently defend him?
"So far from attempting to lower the ancients, I have always
thought, and it is universally admitted, that they knew some
fundamental principles in nature which enabled them to produce
works that have been the admiration of succeeding ages; but I
have not allowed this merit to those leaden-headed imitators,
who, having no consciousness of either symmetry or propriety,
have attempted to mend nature, and in their truly ideal figures
gave similar proportions to a Mercury and a Hercules.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account