“The telescope submitted to the examination of the Committee
of the Franklin Institute is of the reflecting kind; has a
focal length of six feet; the diameter of the speculum is three
inches nine-tenths; the rays of light are reflected but once;
the image formed in the focus of the speculum is viewed by a
common astronomical eye piece, or by a single lens; it has
also an eye piece for viewing land objects, which shows them
erect. The telescope is of the same construction as those of
Sir William Herschell, the observer having his back towards
the object and looking directly towards the speculum. It has
an advantage over those of the Gregorian and Newtonian forms,
by showing the object brighter with the same aperture, there
being no light lost by a second reflection. The diameter of
the speculum is small in proportion to the length of the
instrument; it will bear a diameter of eight inches, with much
advantage for viewing very small stars, in consequence of the
great increase of the light.
The magnifying powers that are used are, forty, ninety, and two
hundred and fifty.”
Through the politeness of Prof. A. D. Bache, the committee were permitted
to compare the performance of Mr. Holcomb’s reflector with that of a
five feet achromatic, of four inches aperture, by Dolland, the property
of the University of Pennsylvania. The instrument was also compared with
a three and a half feet achromatic, by Dolland, and with a Gregorian of
four inches aperture, the mirrors of which had been lately repolished
in London. The short stay of Mr. Holcomb in Philadelphia, prevented the
comparison of it with reflectors in the possession of other members of
the committee.
On the evening of the 14th of April, the committee met by adjournment in
the open lot south of the Pennsylvania Hospital, the use of which was
politely permitted to the committee by the managers of that institution.
The following were the results of the comparisons:—
The moon, nearly full, was at a height to be conveniently viewed with
the lower powers of the instruments: with a power of 350 in the five
feet achromatic, the moon appeared bright and well defined,—with the
same eye-piece, giving a power of 400, in the reflector by Mr. Holcomb,
the moon was sufficiently bright, and equally well defined. The same,
with the exception that the moon was more brilliant, and the field of
view much greater, was remarked with the use of Mr. Holcomb’s highest
magnifier, giving a power of two hundred and fifty.
As an illustration of their comparative performances, it was remarked
that the waved appearance of the outer declivities of the craters of some
of the apparently extinct lunar volcanoes, indicating the successive
depositions of the lava, was more manifest with a power of four hundred
in the reflector.
The immersions of 3 and 4 Geminorum of the sixth and seventh magnitude,
were observed at the same instant of time in each.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account