Homo-sexual lifeFielding, William J. (William John)
Science
Homo-sexual life
Fielding, William J. (William John)
Homosexuality; Sex (Psychology)
Thus, it is probable that the superior Urnings will become in affairs
of the heart, to a large extent, the teachers of future society; and if
so, their influence will tend to the realization and expression of an
attachment less exclusively sensual than the average of today, and to
the diffusion of this in all directions.
To call people of such temperament “morbid,” according to this
authority, is of no use. Such a term, in fact, is absurdly inapplicable
to many, who are among the most amiable and worthy members of society.
Certainly, it brings no solution to the problem in question, and “only
amounts to marking down for disparagement a fellow creature who has
already considerable difficulties to contend with.”
It is a great mistake, he argues, to suppose that their attachments are
necessarily sexual, or connected with sexual acts. On the contrary,
they are often purely emotional in their character; and to confuse
Uranians, as is often done, with libertines having no law but curiosity
in self-indulgence is to do them a great wrong.
It is undoubtedly true that their special temperament may sometimes
cause them difficulty in regard to their sexual relations. But then,
all types have more or less difficulty in making sexual adjustments--so
while the homosexual has some special problems to meet in this
respect--the heterosexual also has his problems which not infrequently
lead to dire results.
The difficulties in both cases, of course, are due in no small
degree to the obstacles put in the way by others, through lack of
understanding. This is both a social and individual problem.
With respect to the personal idiosyncrasies of the urnings, the male
tends to be of a rather gentle, emotional disposition, with defects,
if such exist, in the direction of subtlety, evasiveness, timidity,
vanity, etc. The female, on the other hand, is just the opposite, being
active, fiery, bold and bluntly truthful, with defects running to
brusqueness and coarseness.
The mind of the male urning (characteristic of its feminine bias)
is generally intuitive and instinctive in its perceptions, with
more or less artistic feeling. In extreme types, we find excessive
sentimentality, an individual mincing in gait and manners, something
of a chatter-box, with a tendency to be skilful with the needle and in
woman’s work, sometimes taking pleasure in dressing in women’s clothes.
In the case of the female, we note the opposite characteristics. Her
mind is more logical, scientific and precise than usual with the normal
woman. So marked are these general characteristics, observes Carpenter,
that sometimes by means of them (though not an infallible guide) the
nature of the boy or girl can be detected in childhood, before full
development has taken place. The importance of being able to do this
is readily apparent, if an understanding and sympathetic attitude is
brought to bear on the matter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account