Horse-hoeing husbandry : $b or, an essay on the principles of vegetation and tillage. Designed to introduce a new method of culture; whereby the produce of land will be increased, and the usual expence lessened. Together with accurate descriptions and cuts of the instruments employed in it. — John Shaqi
Horse-hoeing husbandry : $b or, an essay on the principles of vegetation and tillage. Designed to introduce a new method of culture; whereby the produce of land will be increased, and the usual expence lessened. Together with accurate descriptions and cuts of the instruments employed in it.Tull, Jethro
Science
Horse-hoeing husbandry : $b or, an essay on the principles of vegetation and tillage. Designed to introduce a new method of culture; whereby the produce of land will be increased, and the usual expence lessened. Together with accurate descriptions and cuts of the instruments employed in it.
Tull, Jethro
Agriculture -- Early works to 1800; Plows; Tillage
One of our principal Reasons for taking Notice of this Book is, to shew
the Comparison this Author has made between the Old Method of Husbandry
and the New. By his Calculation the Profits arising from the New, are
considerably more than double those of the Old. For, according to him,
the Profits of Twenty Acres of Land for Ten Years, amount, at 10_d._
¹⁄₂ _per_ Livre,
_l._ _s._ _d._
By the Old Method, to 3000 Livres, or 131 5 0 } _Sterling_.
By the New Method, to 7650 Livres, or 334 13 9 }
which makes a prodigious Difference in favour of the latter. As
this Computation was made by one who cannot be supposed to have any
Prejudice in favour of Mr. _Tull_’s Scheme, it will naturally find more
Credit with the Public than any Comparison made by Mr. _Tull_ himself,
or by such as may have an Attachment to his Principles.
It may probably be expected, that the Editors should take Notice of
such Objections as have been made, either to Mr. _Tull_’s Theory
or Practice; but we do not know any that in the least affect his
Principles: They stand uncontroverted: Nor are there any to the
Practice, which may not be equally urged against every Sort of
Improvement. One of the principal which have come to our Knowlege is,
its being impracticable in common Fields, which make a great Part of
this Country, without the Concurrence of every one who occupies Land in
the same Field. But doth not this equally affect the Old Husbandry? For
every such Person is obliged to keep the Turns of plowing, fallowing,
_&c._ with the other Occupiers; so that if any of them were inclinable
to improve their Lands, by sowing Grass-seeds, or any other Method
of Culture, they are now under the same Difficulties as they would
be, were they to practise Mr. _Tull_’s Method. Therefore this is
rather to be lamented as a public Misfortune, than to be brought as
an Objection to the Practicableness of that Method. Others object,
that the introducing this Sort of Husbandry is unnecessary, seeing
the Improvements which are made by Grass-seeds are so considerable;
besides, that the Returns made by the Fold and the Dairy, being much
quicker than those of Grain, engage the Farmer to mix Plowing and
Grazing together. But when this is duly considered it can have no
sort of Weight: for is it not well known that, in those Farms where
the greatest Improvements have been made by Grass-seeds, the Quantity
of Dressing required for the Arable Land often runs away with most of
the Profit of the whole Farm? especially when the Price of Grain is
low. And if this be the Situation of the most improved Farms, what must
be the Case of those which chiefly consist of Arable Land; where most
of the Dressing must be purchased at a great Price, and often fetched
from a considerable Distance? Add to this the great Expence of Servants
and Horses, unavoidable in Arable Farms; and it will appear how great
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account