Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
Both Eckart and the _Theologia Germanica_ would have man ‘break through’
and transcend ‘distinction.’ But it is true, with slight exception, that
the distinctions Eckart would escape are natural; those which the
‘Theology’ would surpass, for the most part artificial. The asceticism
of both is excessive. The self-reduction of Eckart is, however, more
metaphysical than moral; that of the ‘Theology’ moral essentially. Both
would say, the soul of the regenerate man is one with God—cannot be
separated from Him. But only Eckart would say, such soul is not
_distinct_ from God. Both would essay to pass from the Nature to the
Being of God—from his manifested Existence to his Essence, and they both
declare that our nature has its being in the divine. But such assertion,
with Tauler and the _Theologia Germanica_, by no means deifies man. It
is but the Platonic expression of a great Christian doctrine—the real
Fatherhood of God.
Note to page 142.
Itaque tum per totam fere Galliam in civitatibus, vicis, et castellis, a
scholaribus, non solum intra scholas, sed etiam triviatim; nec a
litteratis, aut provectis tantum, sed a pueris et simplicibus, aut certe
stultis, de sancta Trinitate, quæ Deus est, disputaretur, &c.—_Epist._
337, and comp. _Epist._ 332. Bernard at first refused to encounter
Abelard, not simply because from his inexperience in such combats he was
little fitted to cope with that dialectic Goliath—a man of war from his
youth—but because such discussions were in themselves, he thought, an
indignity to the faith.—_Epist._ 189. Abelard he denounces as wrong, not
only in his heretical results, but in principle,—Cum ea ratione nititur
explorare, quæ pia mens fidei vivacitate apprehendit. Fides piorum
credit, non discutit. Sed iste Deum habens suspectum, credere non vult,
nisi quod prius ratione discusserit.—_Epist._ 338.
Note to page 143.
In the eyes both of Anselm and Bernard, to deny the reality of Ideas is
to cut off our only escape from the gross region of sense. Neither faith
nor reason have then left them any basis of operation. We attain to
truth only through the medium of Ideas, by virtue of our essential
relationship to the Divine Source of Ideas—the Infinite Truth. That
Supreme Truth which gives to existing things their reality is also the
source of true thoughts in our minds. Thus our knowledge is an
illumination dependent on the state of the heart towards God. On this
principle all doubt must be criminal, and every heresy the offspring,
not of a bewildered brain, but of a wicked heart.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account