Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
The fundamental maxim of the mediæval religio-philosophy—Invisibilia non
decipiunt, was fertile in delusions. It led men to reject, as
untrustworthy, the testimony of sense and of experience. Thus, in the
transubstantiation controversy of the ninth century, Realism and
Superstition conquered together. It taught them to deduce all knowledge
from certain mental abstractions, Platonic Ideas and Aristotelian Forms.
Thus Bonaventura (who exhibits this tendency at its height) resolves all
science into union with God. The successive attainment of various kinds
of knowledge is, in his system, an approximation, stage above stage, to
God—a scaling of the heights of Illumination, as we are more closely
united with the Divine Word—the repertory of Ideas. Thus, again, the
Scriptures were studied by the schoolmen less as a practical guide for
the present life than as so much material whence they might deduce
metaphysical axioms and propositions—discover more of those divine
abstractions which they regarded as the seminal principles of all
thought and all existence. They were constantly mistaking results which
could only have been attained by revelation or tradition from without,
for truth evolved from within the depths of the finite mind, by virtue
of its immediate commerce with the Infinite. Anselm found no difficulty
in assuming that the God of his ontological proof was identical with the
God of the Bible.
Note to page 144.
Thus, speaking of the angelic state, he says,—Creatura cœli illa est,
præsto habens per quod ista intueatur. Videt Verbum, et in Verbo facta
per Verbum. Nec opus habet ex his quæ facta sunt, factoris notitiam
mendicare.—_De Consid._ V. i., and comp. _Serm. in Cantica_, v. 4.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account