Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
WILLOUGHBY. I have always been partial to the mystics, I must say. They
appear to me to have been the conservators of the poetry and heart of
religion, especially in opposition to the dry prose and formalism of the
schoolmen.
ATHERTON. So they really were in great measure. They did good service,
many of them, in their day—their very errors often such as were possible
only to great souls. Still their notions concerning special revelation
and immediate intuition of God were grievous mistakes.
WILLOUGHBY. Yet without the ardour imparted by such doctrines, they
might have lacked the strength requisite to withstand misconceptions far
more mischievous.
ATHERTON. Very likely. We should have more mercy on the one-sidedness of
men, if we reflected oftener that the evil we condemn may be in fact
keeping out some much greater evil on the other side.
WILLOUGHBY. I think one may learn a great deal from such erratic or
morbid kinds of religion. Almost all we are in a position to say,
concerning spiritual influence, consists of negatives—and what that
influence is _not_ we can best gather from these abnormal phases of the
mind. Certainly an impartial estimate of the good and of the evil
wrought by eminent mystics, would prove a very instructive occupation;
it would be a trying of the spirits by their fruits.
GOWER. And all the more useful as the mistakes of mysticism, whatever
they may be, are mistakes concerning questions which we all feel it so
important to have rightly answered; committed, too, by men of like
passions with ourselves, so that what was danger to them may be danger
also to some of us, in an altered form.
ATHERTON. Unquestionably. Rationalism overrates reason, formalism
action, and mysticism feeling—hence the common attributes of the last,
heat and obscurity. But a tendency to excess in each of these three
directions must exist in every age among the cognate varieties of mind.
You remember how Pindar frequently introduces into an ode two opposite
mythical personages, such as a Pelops or a Tantalus, an Ixion or a
Perseus, one of whom shall resemble the great man addressed by the poet
in his worse, the other in his better characteristics; that thus he may
be at once encouraged and deterred. Deeper lessons than were drawn for
Hiero from the characters of the heroic age may be learnt by us from the
religious struggles of the past. It would be impossible to study the
position of the old mystics without being warned and stimulated by a
weakness and a strength to which our nature corresponds;—unless, indeed,
the enquiry were conducted unsympathizingly; with cold hearts, as far
from the faith of the mystics as from their follies.
GOWER. If we are likely to learn in this way from such an investigation,
suppose we agree to set about it, and at once.
ATHERTON. With all my heart. I have gone a little way in this direction
alone; I should be very glad to have company upon the road.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account