Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
WILLOUGHBY. Certainly not; away with formalities; let us be Thelemites,
and do as we like. We can take up this topic as a bye-work, to furnish
us with some consecutive pursuit in those intervals of time we are so
apt to waste. We can meet—never mind at what intervals, from a week to
three months—and throw into the common stock of conversation our several
reading on the questions in hand.
ATHERTON. Or one of us may take up some individual or period; write down
his thoughts: and we will assemble then to hear and talk the matter
over.
GOWER. Very good. And if Mrs. Atherton and Miss Merivale will sometimes
deign to honour our evenings with their society, our happiness will be
complete.
This mention of the ladies reminds our friends of the time, and they are
breaking up to join them.
The essays and dialogues which follow have their origin in the
conversation to which we have just listened.
Footnote 3:
The writer, who goes by the name of Dionysius Areopagita, teaches that
the highest spiritual truth is revealed only to those ‘who have
transcended every ascent of every holy height, and have left behind
all divine lights and sounds and heavenly discoursings, and have
passed into that Darkness where He really is (as saith the Scripture)
who is above all things.’—_De Mysticâ Theologiâ_, cap. i. § 3.
CHAPTER III.
If we entertain the inward man in the purgative and illuminative
way, that is, in actions of repentance, virtue, and precise duty,
that is the surest way of uniting us to God, whilst it is done by
faith and obedience; and that also is love; and in these peace and
safety dwell. And after we have done our work, it is not discretion
in a servant to hasten to his meal, and snatch at the refreshment of
visions, unions, and abstractions; but first we must gird ourselves,
and wait upon the master, and not sit down ourselves, till we all be
called at the great supper of the Lamb.—JEREMY TAYLOR.
‘So, we are to be etymological to-night,’ exclaimed Gower, as he stepped
forward to join Willoughby in his inspection of a great folio which
Atherton had laid open on a reading desk, ready to entertain his
friends.
‘What says Suidas about our word mysticism?’
WILLOUGHBY. I see the old lexicographer derives the original word from
the root _mu_, to close: the secret rites and lessons of the Greek
mysteries were things about which the mouth was to be closed.[4]
GOWER. We have the very same syllable in our language for the same
thing—only improved in expressiveness by the addition of another
letter,—we say, ‘to be _mum_.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account