Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
ATHERTON. So it seems. The Neo-Platonist was accustomed to call every
other branch of science the ‘lesser mysteries:’ this inward
contemplation, the climax of Platonism, is the _great_ mystery, the
inmost, highest initiation. Withdraw into thyself, he will say, and the
adytum of thine own soul will reveal to thee profounder secrets than the
cave of Mithras. So that his _mysticus_ is emphatically the enclosed,
self-withdrawn, introverted man.[6] This is an initiation which does not
merely, like that of Isis or of Ceres, close the lips in silence, but
the eye, the ear, every faculty of perception, in inward contemplation
or in the ecstatic abstraction of the trance.
WILLOUGHBY. So then it is an effort man is to make—in harmony with the
matter-hating principles of this school—to strip off the material and
sensuous integuments of his being, and to reduce himself to a purely
spiritual element. And in thus ignoring the follies and the phantasms of
Appearance—as they call the actual world—the worshipper of pure Being
believed himself to enjoy at least a transitory oneness with the object
of his adoration?
ATHERTON. So Plotinus would say, if not Plato. And now we come to the
transmission of the idea and the expression to the Church. A writer,
going by the name of Dionysius the Areopagite, ferries this shade over
into the darkness visible of the ecclesiastical world in the fifth
century. The system of mystical theology introduced by him was eminently
adapted to the monastic and hierarchical tendencies of the time. His
‘_Mystic_’ is not merely a sacred personage, acquainted with the
doctrines and participator in the rites called mysteries, but one also
who (exactly after the Neo-Platonist pattern) by mortifying the body,
closing the senses to everything external, and ignoring every
‘intellectual apprehension,’[7] attains in passivity a divine union, and
in ignorance a wisdom transcending all knowledge.
GOWER. Prepared to say, I suppose, with one of old George Chapman’s
characters—
I’ll build all inward—not a light shall ope
The common out-way.—
I’ll therefore live in dark; and all my light,
Like ancient temples, let in at my top.
WILLOUGHBY. Not much light either. The mystic, as such, was not to
_know_ anything about the Infinite, he was ‘to gaze with closed eyes,’
passively to receive impressions, lost in the silent, boundless ‘Dark’
of the Divine Subsistence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account