Household Words, No. 13, June 22, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household Words, No. 13, June 22, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
There is no doubt—between ourselves—that what makes our trade so
profitable is the superstition, weakness, and vanity of parties. We
can’t disguise this fact from ourselves, and I only wish we may be able
to conceal it much longer from others. As enlightened undertakers, we
must admit that we are of no more use on earth than scavengers. All the
good we do is to bury people’s dead out of their sight. Speaking as a
philosopher—which an undertaker surely ought to be—I should say that our
business is merely to shoot rubbish. However, the rubbish is human
rubbish, and bereaved parties have certain feelings which require that
it should be shot gingerly. I suppose such sentiments are natural, and
will always prevail. But I fear that people will by and by begin to
think that pomp, parade, and ceremony are unnecessary upon melancholy
occasions. And whenever this happens, Othello’s occupation will, in a
great measure, be gone.
I tremble to think of mourning relatives considering seriously what is
requisite—and all that is requisite—for decent interment, in a rational
point of view. Nothing more, I am afraid Common Sense would say, than to
carry the body in the simplest chest, and under the plainest covering,
only in a solemn and respectful manner, to the grave, and lay it in the
earth with proper religious ceremonies. I fear Common Sense would be of
opinion that mutes, scarfs, hatbands, plumes of feathers, black horses,
mourning coaches, and the like, can in no way benefit the defunct, or
comfort surviving friends, or gratify anybody but the mob, and the
street-boys. But happily, Common Sense has not yet acquired an influence
which would reduce every burial to a most low affair.
Still, people think now more than they did, and in proportion as they do
think, the worse it will be for business. I consider that we have a most
dangerous enemy in Science. That same Science pokes its nose into
everything—even vaults and churchyards. It has explained how grave-water
soaks into adjoining wells, and has shocked and disgusted people by
showing them that they are drinking their dead neighbours. It has taught
parties resident in large cities that the very air they live in reeks
with human remains, which steam up from graves; and which, of course,
they are continually breathing. So it makes out churchyards to be worse
haunted than they were formerly believed to be by ghosts, and, I may
add, vampyres, in consequence of the dead continually rising from them
in this unpleasant manner. Indeed, Science is likely to make people
dread them a great deal more than Superstition ever did, by showing that
their effluvia breed typhus and cholera; so that they are really and
truly very dangerous. I should not be surprised to hear some sanitary
lecturer say, that the fear of churchyards was a sort of instinct
implanted in the mind, to prevent ignorant people and children from
going near such unwholesome places.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account