Household words, No. 16, July 13, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 16, July 13, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
X 49 arrives. His face betrays sheepishness, combined with mystery. He
turns his bull’s-eye into every corner, and upon every countenance
(including that of the cat), on the premises. He examines all the locks,
bolts, and bars, bestowing extra diligence on those which enclosed the
stolen treasures. These he declares have been “Wiolated;” by which he
means that there has been more than one “Rape of the Lock.” He then
mentions about the non-disturbance of other valuables; takes you
solemnly aside, darkens his lantern, and asks if you suspect any of your
servants, in a mysterious whisper, which implies that _he_ does. He then
examines the upper bedrooms, and in that of the female servants he
discovers the least valuable of the rings, and a cast-off silver
toothpick between the mattresses. You have every confidence in your
maids; but what _can_ you think? You suggest their safe custody; but
your wife intercedes, and the policeman would prefer speaking to his
inspector before he locks anybody up.
Had the whole matter remained in the hands of X 49, it is possible that
your troubles would have lasted you till now. A train of legal
proceedings—actions for defamation of character and suits for
damages—would have followed, which would have cost more than the value
of the jewels, and the entire execration of all your neighbours and
every private friend of your domestics. But, happily, the Inspector
promptly sends a plain, earnest-looking man, who announces himself as
one of the two Detectives of the X division. He settles the whole matter
in ten minutes. His examination is ended in five. As a connoisseur can
determine the painter of a picture at the first glance, or a wine-taster
the precise vintage of a sherry by the merest sip; so the Detective at
once pounces upon the authors of the work of art under consideration, by
the style of performance; if not upon the precise executant, upon the
“school” to which he belongs. Having finished the toilette branch of the
inquiry, he takes a short view of the parapet of your house, and makes
an equally cursory investigation of the attic window fastenings. His
mind is made up, and most likely he will address you in these words:—
“All right, Sir. This is done by one of ‘The Dancing School!’”
“Good Heavens!” exclaims your plundered partner. “Impossible, why _our_
children go to Monsieur Pettitoes, of No. 81, and I assure you he is a
highly respectable professor. As to his pupils, I—”
The Detective smiles and interrupts. “Dancers,” he tells her, “is a name
given to the sort of burglar by whom she had been robbed; and every
branch of the thieving profession is divided into gangs, which are
termed ‘Schools.’ From No. 82 to the end of the street the houses are
unfinished. The thief made his way to the top of one of these, and
crawled to your garret—”
“But we are forty houses distant, and why did he not favour one of my
neighbours with his visit?” you ask.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account