Household words, No. 17, July 20, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 17, July 20, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
With regard, however, to the great superiority of foreign artists over
our own in the present matter of competition, and our utter defeat in
the first trial of the respective strength of Nations, some very
excellent remarks have been put forth by the “Athenæum.” “Let us see,”
says the writer, “if the men who did come up to this architectural
battle have been fairly dealt with. It is essential to the integrity of
a combat that it should be fought with the weapon prescribed. If one of
two combatants bring a sword double the length of his adversary’s, or a
rifle to his rival’s pistol, we should scarcely hold that the defeat of
the latter is proof that he is inferior in fence or in aim.” This is
closely and fairly put. The answer must be, that our artists have _not_
been fairly beaten. The advertisement of the Committee requested
“information and suggestions” on the general form of the building in
plan, &c., and they laid down rules and regulations to which “they
earnestly requested the contributors to conform,” declaring that they
would not recognise any plans which were “sent in a form inconsistent
with these rules.” They were clearly defined. For instance—they directed
that the communications must consist of a single sheet of paper of given
dimensions; that the drawing should be a simple ground-plan, also of
limited dimensions; and that it should _only_ contain “such elevations
and sections of the building, on the same sheet, as might be necessary
to elucidate the system proposed.” Surely all this is clear enough.
Let us now see how some of the most successful of the competitors have
attended to these conditions on which they were to enter the arena.
What extensive pleasure-grounds are those?—and adorned with such
architectural displays? They are the work of Monsieur Cailloux. But, a
little further on, we behold pleasure-grounds and architectural
structures yet more ornate and refined. They are from the hand of
Monsieur Charpentier. Further on, another, by Monsieur Cleemputte; and
another by Monsieur Gaulle—a complicated work of thoughtful elaboration.
Yet even these are destined to be surpassed by the luxurious fancies of
other artists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account