Household words, No. 2, April 6, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 2, April 6, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
The dogs too. Ha ha! As they go by, they look at me and this dog,
in quite a friendly way. They never suspect how I should hold on to
the tip of his tail, if I consulted my own feelings instead of our
proprietor’s. It’s almost worth being here, to think of some confiding
dog who has seen me, going too near a friend of mine who lives at a
hackney-coach stand in Oxford Street. You wouldn’t stop _his_ squeaking
in a hurry, if my friend got a chance at him.
It’s the same with the children. There’s a young gentleman with a hat
and feathers, resident in Portland Place, who brings a penny to our
proprietor, twice a week. He wears very short white drawers, and has
mottled legs above his socks. He hasn’t the least idea what I should
do to his legs, if I consulted my own inclinations. He never imagines
what I am thinking of, when we look at one another. May he only take
those legs, in their present juicy state, close to the cage of my
brother-in-law of the Zoological Gardens, Regent’s Park!
Call yourselves rational beings, and talk about our being reclaimed?
Why, there isn’t one of us who wouldn’t astonish you, if we could only
get out! Let _me_ out, and see whether _I_ should be meek or not. But
this is the way you always go on in—you know you do. Up at Pentonville,
the sparrow says—and he ought to know, for he was born in a stack
of chimneys in that prison—you are spending I am afraid to say how
much every year out of the rates, to keep men in solitude, where they
+CAN’T+ do any harm (that you know of), and then you sing all sorts of
choruses about their being good. So am I what you call good—here. Why?
Because I can’t help it. Try me outside!
You ought to be ashamed of yourselves, the Magpie says; and I agree
with him. If you are determined to pet only those who take things and
hide them, why don’t you pet the Magpie and me? We are interesting
enough for you, ain’t we? The Mouse says you are not half so particular
about the honest people. He is not a bad authority. He was almost
starved when he lived in a workhouse, wasn’t he? He didn’t get much
fatter, I suppose, when he moved to a labourer’s cottage? He was thin
enough when he came from that place, here—I know that. And what does
the Mouse (whose word is his bond) declare? He declares that you don’t
take half the care you ought; of your own young, and don’t teach
’em half enough. Why don’t you then? You might give our proprietor
something to do, I should think, in twisting miserable boys and girls
_into_ their proper nature, instead of twisting us out of ours. You are
a nice set of fellows, certainly, to come and look at Happy Families,
as if you had nothing else to look after!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account