Household words, No. 20, August 10, 1850 : $b A weekly journal — John Shaqi
Household words, No. 20, August 10, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 20, August 10, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
It may give some support to the theory of tadpole development above
mentioned, to add, that the same cause produces the very same effects
upon human beings; upon human mothers, and upon human children. Human
mothers living in dark cellars produce an unusual proportion of
defective children. Go into the narrow streets, and the dark lanes,
courts, and alleys of our splendid cities, there you will see an unusual
number of deformed people, men, women, and children, but particularly
children. In some cells under the fortifications of Lisle, a number of
poor people took up their abode; the proportion of defective infants
produced by them became so great, that it was deemed necessary to issue
an order commanding these cells to be shut up. The window duties
multiply cells like those of the fortifications of Lisle, in London, in
Liverpool, in Manchester, in Bristol, and in every city and town in
England by hundreds and by thousands, and with the same result; but the
cells here are not shut up, nor is the cause that produces them removed.
Even in cases in which the absence of light is not so complete as to
produce a result thus definite and striking, the effects of the
privation are still abundantly manifest in the pale and sickly
complexion, and the enfeebled and stunted frame; nor can it be
otherwise, since, from the essential constitution of organised beings,
light is as necessary to the development of the animal as it is to the
growth of the plant. The diseases the want of it produces are of long
continuance, and waste the means of life before death results; they may
therefore be characterised as pauperising diseases. As to death itself,
it has been calculated that nearly ten thousand persons perish annually
in London alone from diseases solely produced by an impeded circulation
of air and admission of light.
This prodigal waste of health, strength, and of life itself, falls much
more heavily on the poor, than the mere fiscal burden, imposed by the
tax, falls on the richer classes. Inasmuch, then, as health is the
capital of the working man, whatever be the necessities of the state,
_nothing_ can justify a tax affecting the health of the people, and
especially the health of the labouring community, whose bodily strength
constitutes their wealth, and oftentimes their only possession. In
conclusion we may say, without wishing to libel any respectable Act of
Parliament, that the Window-Tax kills countless human beings in tens of
thousands every year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account