Household words, No. 22, August 24, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 22, August 24, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
“It is very doubtful, to me, whether there is, upon the whole,
anything Man is so ambitious to imitate, as an ostler, a jockey, a
stage coachman, a horse-dealer, or a dog-fancier. There may be some
other character which I do not immediately remember, that fires him
with emulation; but, if there be, I am sure it is connected with
Horses, or Dogs, or both. This is an unconscious compliment, on the
part of the tyrant, to the nobler animals, which I consider to be very
remarkable. I have known Lords, and Baronets, and Members of
Parliament, out of number, who have deserted every other calling, to
become but indifferent stablemen or kennelmen, and be cheated on all
hands, by the real aristocracy of those pursuits who were regularly
born to the business.
“Ail this, I say, is a tribute to our superiority which I consider to
be very remarkable. Yet, still, I can’t quite understand it. Man can
hardly devote himself to us, in admiration of our virtues, because he
never imitates them. We Horses are as honest, though I say it, as
animals can be. If, under the pressure of circumstances, we submit to
act at a Circus, for instance, we always show that we are acting. We
never deceive anybody. We would scorn to do it. If we are called upon
to do anything in earnest, we do our best. If we are required to run a
race falsely, and to lose when we could win, we are not to be relied
upon, to commit a fraud; Man must come in at that point, and force us
to it. And the extraordinary circumstance to me, is, that Man (whom I
take to be a powerful species of Monkey) is always making us nobler
animals the instruments of his meanness and cupidity. The very name of
our kind has become a byeword for all sorts of trickery and cheating.
We are as innocent as counters at a game—and yet this creature WILL
play falsely with us!
“Man’s opinion, good or bad, is not worth much, as any rational Horse
knows. But, justice is justice; and what I complain of, is, that
Mankind talks of us as if We had something to do with all this. They
say that such a man was ‘ruined by Horses.’ Ruined by Horses! They
can’t be open, even in that, and say he was ruined by Men; but they
lay it at _our_ stable-door! As if we ever ruined anybody, or were
ever doing anything but being ruined ourselves, in our generous desire
to fulfil the useful purposes of our existence!
“In the same way, we get a bad name as if we were profligate company.
‘So and so got among Horses, and it was all up with him.’ Why, _we_
would have reclaimed him—_we_ would have made him temperate,
industrious, punctual, steady, sensible—what harm would he ever have
got from _us_, I should wish to ask?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account