Household words, No. 25, September 14, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 25, September 14, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
An illustration of this peculiarity, of the ease with which a “wild
Irishman” will forego every prudent consideration in preference to the
disgrace of having been beaten in battle occurred, but a short while
since. In a Union workhouse in the south, some of the able-bodied
paupers came into rather forcible collision with the officials. The
cause of dispute was the supply of “stirabout,” which being deemed
insufficient by a few stout fellows, they marched into the kitchen,
seized ladles and bowls, and proceeded to help themselves. An alarm of
this lawless incursion being given, in rushed to the rescue the master
and his myrmidons. Fast and furious were the blows dealt by both
parties, but the strong hand of the law at length prevailed, the
well-fed officers triumphed over their famine-weakened foes, and the
stalwart master counted his victory by the number of broken heads
prostrated by the huge ladle which he wielded. The proprietors of the
damaged craniums were subsequently conveyed to the surgeon’s room, and
severally bandaged and plastered as their cases required. Most of the
hurts were found to be trifling, but one poor fellow had received a
severe contusion. With the dislike which many of his countrymen feel, to
submit to the prescription of qualified practitioners, Tim Murphy, in a
day or two, asked for his discharge, threw off the well-fixed bandages,
and betook himself to the squalid shelter of a cabin belonging to an
“uncle’s son,” nearly as poor as himself, an unqualified “docther,”
whose unprofessional practice it was to prescribe charms and philtres in
place of physic. This reckless proceeding was followed by its natural
result. The hurt which, with common care, would have readily healed,
became inflamed, fever ensued, and the man died. This melancholy finale
to the workhouse row caused much excitement, and an investigation of the
whole business was instituted by the magistrates. On the day when it
took place, the hall of the workhouse was crowded, and although it was
shown that the master was justified in using force to protect the
kitchen stores from the paupers, and it was also proved that under
proper surgical treatment the patient would, in all human probability,
have recovered, yet the point to be decided was, whether John Minahan,
the master, had used unnecessary violence in the discharge of his duty.
The principal witness against him, was a man who appeared with evident
“tokens of a foughten field” on his forehead, and who indeed had been
the only recipient, besides Tim Murphy, of any serious injury. The
examination proceeded nearly as follows:—
After having deposed readily and clearly to the fact of the combat, and
of John Minahan having rushed to the rescue of the porridge-pots, he was
asked:
“Did you see the master strike any one in particular?”
“Not he, indeed; he was no ways particular; but he murdhered and killed
every one that came in his way.”
“Did he strike you?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account