Nor is it necessary for us, we believe, to expatiate on our leading
reasons for adding this new undertaking to our present enterprise. The
intimate connexion between the facts and realities of the time, and the
means by which we aim, in Household Words, to soften what is hard in
them, to exalt what is held in little consideration, and to show the
latent hope there is in what may seem unpromising, needs not to be
pointed out. All that we sought to express in our Preliminary Word, in
reference to this work, applies, we think, to its proposed companion. As
another humble means of enabling those who accept us for their friend,
to bear the world’s rough-cast events to the anvil of courageous duty,
and there beat them into shape, we enter on the project, and confide in
its success.
THE TROUBLED WATER QUESTION.
My excellent and eloquent friend, Lyttleton, of Pump Court, Temple,
barrister-at-law, disturbed me on a damp morning at the end of last
month, to bespeak my company to a meeting at which he intended to hold
forth. ‘It is,’ he said, ‘the Great Water Supply Congress, which
assembles to-morrow.’
‘Do you know anything of the subject?’
‘A vast deal both practically and theoretically. Practically, I pay for
my little box in the Regent’s Park, twice the price for water our friend
Fielding is charged, and both supplies are derived from the same
Company. Yet his is a mansion, mine is a cottage; his rent more than
doubles mine in amount, and his family trebles mine in number. So much
for the consistency and exactions of an irresponsible monopoly.
Practically, again, there are occasions when my cisterns are without
water. So much for deficient supply.’
‘Is your water bad?’
‘Not absolutely unwholesome; but I have drunk better.’
‘Now then, Theoretically.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account