Household words, no. 304, January 19, 1856 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, no. 304, January 19, 1856 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
it could have reached a barrister in London by the second of October.
The public reports of the proceedings connected with the formation of
the Association had informed him that there was a proposition to pay
penalties incurred by occupiers who refused to fence. There was no
other source of information open to him.
This point is of importance to us, and we for the second time place
it beyond question that, before the appearance of the Special Report,
the Association did combine to pay penalties, in obedience to the
recommendation of a body of mill-owners who had gone to London with the
hope of getting the Factory Act into discredit with the government.
The recommendation was read at the meeting[B] in these distinct
terms: “The deputation are of opinion, that a fund of not less than
five thousand pounds should be immediately raised; and they suggest
that all cases of prosecution which the committee of management are of
opinion can be legitimately dealt with by the Association, shall be
defended by, _and the penalties or damages paid out of, the funds of
the Association_.” Whereupon it was moved, seconded, and unanimously
resolved:
“That the recommendation in the report, to raise immediately a sum of
not less than £5,000 be immediately carried into execution, and that
an additional contribution of one shilling per nominal horse-power
from each mill-occupier (making a total of two shillings) be at once
called for, to enable the committee to carry out the recommendation
to defend, _at the cost of the Association_, all cases of prosecution
which they may consider fairly to come within the sphere of the
Association.”[C]
We have only to add, that the report including these resolutions,
besides receiving a wide notoriety through the newspapers, was printed
and circulated by the Association itself, and that a copy of it was
obtained by us before we wrote upon the subject. There can be no doubt,
then, under what impressions the first members of the Association
joined it, and of the accusation under which it justly lay until it
thought best publicly to withdraw from a dangerous position.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account