Household words, no. 304, January 19, 1856 : $b A weekly journal — John Shaqi
Household words, no. 304, January 19, 1856 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, no. 304, January 19, 1856 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
The pamphlet then adopts the precise tone of the mill-owners in
speaking of the accidents as chiefly “of so slight a nature that they
would not be noticed anywhere but in a special registration like that
provided by the Factory Act. For instance, seven hundred are cases
of cut fingers. Any worker who rubs off a bit of skin from finger
or thumb, or sustains the slightest cut which interferes with the
spinning process for a single day, has the injury registered under the
act.” In the next place the yearly deaths by preventable accidents
from machinery, which number about forty, are reduced to eleven, by
excluding all machinery except the actual shafts, and throughout the
pamphlet afterwards the number eleven, so obtained, is used--once in a
way that has astonished us, as it will certainly surprise our readers.
Even lower down on the same page the writer slips into the statement,
that there are only twelve deaths a-year by “mill-accidents from all
kinds of factory machinery.” We wish it were so; but in the last
report, published before we made our comments, there were twenty-one
slain in six months; one hundred and fifty had, in six months, lost
parts of their right hands; one hundred and thirty, parts of their left
hands; twenty-eight lost arms or legs; two hundred and fifty had bones
broken; a hundred had suffered fracture or serious damage to the head
and face.
In the report for the half-year next following, the deaths by machinery
in factories were eighteen; one hundred and sixty-one lost the right
hand, or, more generally, parts of it; one hundred and eighteen the
left hand, or parts of it; two hundred and twenty had bones broken.
Thirty-nine, therefore, was the number of deaths in the year last
reported (a fresh half-yearly report is at present due), and there
was no lack of accidents more serious than the “rubbing off a bit of
skin.” Of the factory accidents, we are also told, not five per cent.
are owing to machinery. If so, great indeed must be the number of the
whole! But it is solely of the accidents arising from machinery that
we from the first have spoken, since upon them only the law is founded
which we wish to see maintained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account