Household words, no. 9, May 25, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, no. 9, May 25, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
Wordsworth’s poetry had long to contend against the conventional
prepossessions of the literary world. From the beginning, however, his
genius was felt by superior minds, and by a few young unprejudiced
enthusiasts. His first admirers were literally a sect, and their
admiration was, like the devotion of all sectarians, ardent and
indiscriminating. They have, however, served as interpreters between him
and the reading public, and thus his merits have come to be generally
acknowledged. His writings lent a tone to the works of some who, like
Shelley, dissented from his theory; and some who, like Byron,
systematically scoffed at them. The public taste was thus insensibly
approximated to them. Even yet, however, Wordsworth is probably more
praised than liked. But the process will go on, and in time what is
really valuable in his poems will take the place that is due to it in
the land’s literature.
Of the first writings of Wordsworth little need be said. Though they
contain valuable thoughts, they are lumbering and sufficiently
unreadable. The once furious controversy about his literary creed as
heresy, need not be resuscitated; there were great errors on both sides.
If his merits were individually depreciated, there was much in his
seemingly supercilious re-assertion, rather than defence and explanation
of his views, to extenuate the petulance with which he was often
treated. As for his wanderings in the fields of politics and polemics,
he is no exception to the general truth, that the warmest admirers of
poets must regret their deviations into such uncongenial by-ways.
The man was like his poetry; simple and therefore conservative in his
tastes: self-reliant and sometimes repulsive from his austerity, yet
with a rich fund of benevolence beneath the hard exterior. His frame was
strong and sinewy from his habits of exercise; his look heavy, and, at
first sight, unimpressive; but there was an inexpressible charm in his
smile. He was the antithesis of the materialist and practical activity
of the time. He did not understand, and therefore could not appreciate,
the ennobling tendencies of the social and scientific career on which
this age has entered—an age into which he had lingered, rather than to
which he belonged. He looked out upon the world from his egotistic
isolation rather as a critical spectator, than as a sympathiser. His
views of it were rusted over with the conservative prejudices of the
past. Railways he hated, and against them waged a sonneteering war.
Although they were rapidly increasing the commerce, comforts,
intercourse, affluence, and happiness of the whole community, they
invaded the selfish solitude of the one man; and single-handed he did
battle against the armies of invading tourists, who came to share with
him the heathful pleasures of the mountain and the lake, in which he
would have almost preserved a patent right for the few.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account