But men cannot finely pioneer nor nobly adventure until after they have
learned certain lessons in life. Men must learn to be self-reveringly
independent, which implies not the aloofness of solitude but the
aloneness when necessary of moral and spiritual self-reliance. Man must
learn to live his own life. There is no greater danger in our time than
that a man shall submit to the tyranny of the crowd. A man need not be
remote from nor yet alien to the world and yet he may live his own life
and live within himself. We suffer ourselves to come under the
domination of mob-feeling and mob-thinking, such as it is, because we
have not learned the art of shutting ourselves away at times from the
world. We seem never to dare to be alone because, though we know it not,
we would fain avoid facing life’s problems. We must understand, too,
that, if the problems of our own life are to be met and solved, these
things cannot be done vicariously. Not parents nor teachers nor
ministers can solve those pressing problems of our inner life with which
a man can cope effectively only amid the solitude of his inmost life.
Until you have learned the art of separating yourself for some time in
every day from the multitude, you will not learn how to think out and
think through life’s problems. You will not even know that there are
problems to be resolved.
But while life is to be lived in the spirit of self-reverence and
self-reliance, life’s great questions cannot be faced aright unless they
be faced selflessly. Life is not to be egocentric but heterocentric. The
question that a man must put is not what is he going to get out of life,
how can he get the most out of life, but how can he put the most and the
best into life. Life is not to be interpreted in terms of self, of
individual gain, of personal advantage. If it be possible to
differentiate between two classes in the world, these classes are
respectively made up of the men who read life in the language of
privilege and advantage and the men who interpret life in the terms of
duty and obligation and responsibility. The selfless are the only beings
who know how to live, who have learned and mastered the art of life. It
is always possible to draw the distinction between the man who lives for
himself, for what he can get out of life, for the enhancement of his own
fame, for the enlargement of his own power, and the man who puts himself
second, who lives for the good of others, who lives for the good, who is
capable of denying self. The noblest of men and women are they who
prescribe life to self in terms of duty to the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account