The “life” that is found in human bodies and throughout the organic
world is impersonal. It is material, or, rather, physical, in the sense
that it has not any existence apart from the organic matter of which
it constitutes an affection or attribute. The case is analogous to
that of gravitation. According to the accepted Newtonian philosophy
every particle of matter in the universe attracts, and is attracted by,
every other particle: it gravitates: it is ponderable. But there is no
such thing as gravitation _per se_, though there may be an entity that
causes gravitation. It is convenient, for the purposes of language and
the orderly expression of thought, to speak of it separately, just as
colour, temperature, illumination, form, structure and other affections
are referred to; the understanding, however, being always that they are
not in themselves entities and are not characterised by anything in the
nature of self-existence.
Science does not at present hold that life is an attribute of all
matter. Minerals and other forms of what is called inorganic matter are
considered to be devoid of life, and the same destitution is asserted
with respect to “dead,” “inanimate” organic matter. Life is met with
only in “living,” “animate” organic matter; just as crystallisation
is found only in “crystalline” and not in “amorphous” matter; and--to
pursue the simile--it may be pointed out that the same matter which
is crystalline under some conditions becomes amorphous under others,
as in the case of carbon, which is sometimes diamond and sometimes
charcoal. In like manner living matter may change into dead matter--a
change which is called “death”; and dead matter may change into living
matter, as, for example, when food is assimilated by animals and
vegetables.
The true nature of the “life” met with in living organic matter is
not yet understood. Modern science has shown, indisputably, that the
doctrine of the conservation of energy applies without modification
to living beings just as much as to inanimate substances. The
idea of there being any specific “vital force,” “vital material”
or “vital energy” has long ago been abandoned. All the particular
phenomena observed by morphologists, physiologists, embryologists,
palæontologists and ætiologists--_i.e._ by the whole world of
biologists--can be satisfactorily explained in terms of chemistry,
physical force, energy and dynamics. But biology cannot as yet give an
equally clear account of the co-ordinated vitality of anything that
lives. It cannot even state the how and why of the simplest unicellular
organism. “We are forced,” says a leading authority, “to the conclusion
that a living organism is a particular synthesis of matter and energy,
the secret of whose organisation remains hidden.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account