“Experience must be our guide. To shut the door on actual observation
and experiment in this particular region, because of preconceived
ideas and obstinate prejudice, is an attitude common enough, even
among scientific men; but it is an attitude markedly unscientific.
Certain people have decided that inquiry into the activities of
discarnate mind is futile; some few consider it impious; many,
perhaps wisely distrusting their own powers, shrink from entering on
such an inquiry. But if there are any facts to be ascertained, it
must be the duty of some volunteers to ascertain them: and for people
having any acquaintance with scientific history to shut their eyes
to facts when definitely announced, and to forbid investigation or
report concerning them on pain of ostracism,--is to imitate a byegone
theological attitude in a spirit of unintended flattery--a flattery
which from every point of view is eccentric; and likewise to display
an extraordinary lack of humour.”
It must, however, be added that, a little further on in the same book,
Sir Oliver speaks somewhat less positively. He says--
“Matter is an indirect medium of communication between mind and mind.
That direct telepathic intercourse should be able to occur between
mind and mind, without all this intermediate physical mechanism, is
therefore not really surprising. _It has to be proved, no doubt_,
but the fact is intrinsically less puzzling than many of those other
facts to which we have grown hardened by usage.”
This account of telepathy is vague, and a similar vagueness also
characterises the utterances of other authorities on the same subject.
But no good reason exists why the matter should not be dealt with in a
manner very much more clear and precise.
We should consider, in the first place, that the word “mind” really
means “soul,” and is used merely for the sake of convenience as
concentrating attention upon the soul’s faculty of intelligence apart
from its sentient, emotional, volitional and ethical attributes.
Accordingly, when a telepathist speaks of mind communicating directly
with mind, it is the same thing as saying that soul communicates
directly with soul; and this, in its turn, implies the corollary that,
whether spirits be incarnate or discarnate, the idea of telepathic
intercourse is admissible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account