How to tell fortunes : $b containing Napoleon's Oraculum and the key to work it; also tells fortunes by cards, lucky and unlucky days, signs and omens.Warford, Aaron A.
Religion
How to tell fortunes : $b containing Napoleon's Oraculum and the key to work it; also tells fortunes by cards, lucky and unlucky days, signs and omens.
Warford, Aaron A.
Fortune-telling; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Relations with fortune-tellers
46. The right hand itching is a sign that the person will shake hands
with a stranger; the left hand itching is a sign that money will be
received soon.
47. If you sing during any meal, it is a sign you will soon be
disappointed.
48. To cross a funeral procession is an ill omen.
49. To find a pearl in an oyster betokens good fortune.
50. To break a looking-glass foretells death. Grose tells us that
“breaking a looking-glass betokens a mortality in the family, commonly
the master.” Bonaparte’s (Napoleon I.) superstition upon this point
is often recorded. “During one of his campaigns in Italy,” says M.
de Constant, “he broke the glass over Josephine’s portrait. He never
rested till the return of the courier he forthwith dispatched to assure
himself of her safety, so strong was the impression of her death upon
his mind.”
51. To find a trefoil, or four-leaved clover, implies good luck; a
five-leaved clover, bad luck. Melton, in his “Astrologaster,” says that
“if a man walking in the fields, finde any foure-leaved grasse, he
shall, in a small while after, finde some good thing.”
52. If four persons cross hands while in the act of shaking hands, it
indicates that two of the party will soon be married.
53. If three unmarried persons having the same Christian name meet at
table, it is a sign that one of the three will be married within a year.
54. To be startled by a snake is a sign of sickness.
55. When thirteen persons sit down together at table, it is a sign that
one of the party will die within a year. Fosbroke, in his _Encyclopædia
of Antiquities_, states that “thirteen in company was considered
an unlucky number by the ancient Romans;” but he does not give any
classical authority for this statement.
There is at Dantzic a clock, which at 12 admits, through a door,
Christ and the eleven, shutting out Judas, who is admitted at 1. But
is not the belief older than the clock? The iniquity of Judas may have
led him to be considered the thirteenth at the Lord’s Supper; and
his self-destruction may have given to the number thirteen its fatal
association.
It has, however, been explained away by M. Quetelet, in his work on
_Probabilities_ as follows: “If the probability be required, that out
of thirteen persons, of different ages, one of them, at least, shall
die within a year, it will be found that the chances are about one to
one that one death, at least, will occur. This calculation, by means
of a false interpretation, has given rise to the prejudice, no less
ridiculous, that the danger will be avoided by inviting a greater
number of guests, which can only have the effect of augmenting the
probability of the event so much apprehended.”
This belief obtains in Italy and Russia, as well as in England. Moore,
in his _Diary_, vol. ii., p. 206, mentions there being thirteen at
dinner, one day, at Madame Catalani’s, when a French countess, who
lived with her up-stairs, was sent for to remedy the grievance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account