Before doing so, however, our pedigree-hunter should carefully consider
the _surname_ of the individual in question. If he boasts of an
uncommon one, as say, for instance, _Vandeleur_, the chances are that
all the Vandeleurs mentioned in the same parish books will belong to
his family. If, however, he is a _Smith_--well, the Smiths are not a
very small tribe, and several of the name unrelated to each other
might appear in the same parish. To obviate the difficulties which this
would entail, our pedigree-hunter should be clear as to the district in
the parish or name of the house in which his ancestor lived. But, if he
does not know this, how is he to ascertain it?
Well, he probably _will_ know it in the case of the latest of his
ancestors, say, his father or grandfather, and let him work from that
point. Failing this, a study of the family names in each district
should reveal the secret.
The _surname_ itself, especially if the searcher has been able to trace
the ancestry some way back, should be carefully noted with regard to
the different forms in which it may appear, for in early days there was
a quite delightful variation in the spelling of names; so a somewhat
similar sounding name, if spelt differently, should not be ruled out of
court as having necessarily nothing to do with the matter, the _odds_
being generally on the other side.
Even if parochial registers supply no additional details to those
which friends have been able to give, their testimony may be of great
importance, for the recollections of old friends are more or less
traditional, and the golden rule to be most carefully observed by
genealogists, is
_Verify your Information._
An honest searcher would never appreciate a “faked” pedigree; but it
is fatally easy to assume a certain point, and, working from that
assumption, to have all future details more or less incorrect.
No time should be considered wasted which is spent on verifying
information.
The searchers should not even take it for granted that all Peerages or
similar works are always correct; as a matter of fact, this is far from
being the case.
Even in the mystic circle of the Baronetage it is said that some
sixty claimants have appeared, whose titles, though received for long
unchallenged, cannot be fully verified.
Our late king recently ordered an _official_ roll of the Baronetage to
be registered and kept.
This does not preclude, however, the pedigree-hunter from consulting
Peerages and works of Family History at libraries; indeed, this might
well be the next stage in his search. Let him look through his Library
Index, under the heading “Genealogy,” and consult works in it which he
thinks might bear on the matter in hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account