Human Bullets: A Soldier's Story of Port ArthurSakurai, Tadayoshi
History
Human Bullets: A Soldier's Story of Port Arthur
Sakurai, Tadayoshi
Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905
body of one soldier called Hyodo, who had been one of the forlorn-hope
scouts of the Second Company. He had no less than forty-seven shot
in his body, twenty-five on the right arm only. Another soldier of a
neighboring regiment received more than seventy shot. These instances
prove how destructive is the machine-gun! Of course, the surgeons could
not locate so many wounds in one body, and they invented a new name,
“Whole body honeycombed with gun-wounds.” Whenever our army attacked
the enemy’s position, it was invariably this machine-gun that made us
suffer and damaged us most severely.
In this camp we found four or five of the enemy’s war-dogs dead. They
were strongly built, with short brown hair and sharp clever faces. They
were shot by our guns, and, though brutes, had participated in the
honorable death of the battle-field. The Russians train these dogs for
war purposes and make them useful in more ways than one. I am told that
sometimes these dogs acted as scouts.
I carefully inspected the scene of this terrible fight and learned how
strong were both the natural position and the arrangements for defense.
I almost marveled at our final success, even with a terrible loss of
life and blood. Our engineers dug out a number of ground-mines and
destroyed wire-entanglements put up by the enemy. The Russian loss was
also very severe; a large number of their dead were left in the camp
or on the line of their retreat—those whom they with difficulty picked
up, were piled upon ten or more ox-carts and carried away through
Hanchia-tun toward Port Arthur.
Let me leave the battle-field for a while and tell you what impression
our army gave the Russians, and also recount the story of one or two
valiant soldiers. After this battle, our detachment picked up a note
written by the commander of a Russian division. Translated, it is as
follows:—
“The Japanese army knows how to march, but not how to retreat. Once
they begin to attack a position, they continue most fiercely and most
obstinately. That I can approve of, but when circumstances do not
permit a forward march, a retreat may sometimes be made useful. But
the Japanese always continue an attack irrespective of the amount of
danger. Probably the Japanese books of tactics make no study at all of
retreating.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account