Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
Pride and vanity are names which are commonly applied only to forms of
self-approval that strike us as disagreeable or egotistical; but they
may be used in a somewhat larger sense to indicate simply a more or less
stable attitude of the social self toward the world in which it is
reflected; the distinction being of the same sort as that between
unstable and rigid egotism already suggested.
These differences in stability, which are of great importance in the
study of social personality, are perhaps connected with the contrast
between the more receptive and the more constructive types of mind.
Although in the best minds reception and construction are harmoniously
united, and although it may be shown that they are in a measure mutually
dependent, so that neither can be perfect without the other, yet as a
rule they are not symmetrically developed, and this lack of symmetry
corresponds to divergences of personal character. Minds of one sort are,
so to speak, endogenous or ingrowing in their natural bent, while those
of another are exogenous or outgrowing; that is to say, those of the
former kind have a relatively strong turn for working up old material,
as compared with that for taking in new; cogitation is more pleasant to
them than observation; they prefer the sweeping and garnishing of their
house to the confusion of entertaining visitors; while of the other sort
the opposite of this may be said. Now, the tendency of the endogenous or
inward activities is to secure unity and stability of thought and
character at the possible expense of openness and adaptability; because
the energy goes chiefly into systematization, and in attaining this the
mind is pretty sure to limit its new impressions to those that do not
disturb too much that unity and system it loves so well. These traits
are, of course, manifested in the person’s relation to others. The
friends he has “and their acceptance tried” he grapples to his soul with
hooks of steel, but is likely to be unsympathetic and hard toward
influences of a novel character. On the other hand, the exogenous or
outgrowing mind, more active near the periphery than toward the centre,
is open to all sorts of impressions, eagerly taking in new material,
which is likely never to get much arrangement; caring less for the order
of the house than that it should be full of guests, quickly responsive
to personal influences, but lacking that depth and tenacity of sympathy
that the other sort of mind shows with people congenial with itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account