Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
Language seldom distinguishes clearly between a way of feeling and its
visible expression; and so the word vanity, which means primarily
emptiness, indicates either a weak or hollow appearance of worth put on
in the endeavor to impress others, or the state of feeling that goes
with it. It is the form social self-approval naturally takes in a
somewhat unstable mind, not sure of its image. The vain man, in his more
confident moments, sees a delightful reflection of himself, but knowing
that it is transient, he is afraid it will change. He has not fixed it,
as the proud man has, by incorporation with a stable habit of thought,
but, being immediately dependent for it upon others, is at their mercy
and very vulnerable, living in the frailest of glass houses which may be
shattered at any moment; and, in fact, this catastrophe happens so often
that he gets somewhat used to it and soon recovers from it. While the
image which the proud person contemplates is fairly consistent, and,
though distorted, has a solid basis in his character, so that he will
not accept praise for qualities he does not believe himself to possess;
vanity has no stable idea of itself and will swallow any shining bait.
The person will gloat now on one pleasing reflection of himself, now on
another, trying to mimic each in its turn, and becoming, so far as he
can, what any flatterer says he is, or what any approving person seems
to think he is. It is characteristic of him to be so taken up with his
own image in the other’s mind that he is hypnotized by it, as it were,
and sees it magnified, distorted, and out of its true relation to the
other contents of that mind. He does not see, as so often happens, that
he is being managed and made a fool of; he “gives himself away”—fatuity
being of the essence of vanity. On the other hand, and for the same
reason, a vain person is frequently tortured by groundless imaginings
that someone has misunderstood him, slighted him, insulted him, or
otherwise mistreated his social effigy.
Of course the immediate result of vanity is weakness, as that of pride
is strength; but on a wider view there is something to be said for it.
Goethe exclaims in Wilhelm Meister, “Would to heaven all men were vain!
that is were vain with clear perception, with moderation, and in a
proper sense: we should then, in the cultivated world, have happy times
of it. Women, it is told us, are vain from the very cradle; yet does it
not become them? do they not please us the more? How can a youth form
himself if he is not vain? An empty, hollow nature will, by this means,
at least contrive to give itself an outward show, and a proper man will
soon train himself from the outside inwards.”[56] That is to say,
vanity, in moderation, may indicate an openness, a sensibility, a
teachability, that is a good augury of growth. In youth, at least, it is
much preferable to pride.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account