Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
The peculiar relations to other persons attending any marked personal
deficiency or peculiarity are likely to aggravate, if not to produce,
abnormal manifestations of self-feeling. Any such trait sufficiently
noticeable to interrupt easy and familiar intercourse with others, and
make people talk and think _about_ a person or _to_ him rather than
_with_ him, can hardly fail to have this effect. If he is naturally
inclined to pride or irritability, these tendencies, which depend for
correction upon the flow of sympathy, are likely to be increased. One
who shows signs of mental aberration is, inevitably perhaps, but
cruelly, shut off from familiar, thoughtless intercourse, partly
excommunicated; his isolation is unwittingly proclaimed to him on every
countenance by curiosity, indifference, aversion or pity, and in so far
as he is human enough to need free and equal communication and feel the
lack of it, he suffers pain and loss of a kind and degree which others
can only faintly imagine, and for the most part ignore. He finds himself
apart, “not in it,” and feels chilled, fearful, and suspicious. Thus
“queerness” is no sooner perceived than it is multiplied by reflection
from other minds. The same is true in some degree of dwarfs, deformed or
disfigured persons, even the deaf and those suffering from the
infirmities of old age. The chief misery of the decline of the
faculties, and a main cause of the irritability that often goes with it,
is evidently the isolation, the lack of customary appreciation and
influence, which only the rarest tact and thoughtfulness on the part of
others can alleviate.
CHAPTER VII
HOSTILITY
SIMPLE OR ANIMAL ANGER—SOCIAL ANGER—THE FUNCTION OF HOSTILITY—THE
DOCTRINE OF NON-RESISTANCE—CONTROL AND TRANSFORMATION OF HOSTILITY
BY REASON—HOSTILITY AS PLEASURE OR PAIN—THE IMPORTANCE OF ACCEPTED
SOCIAL STANDARDS—FEAR.
Anger, like other emotions, seems to exist at birth as a simple,
instinctive animal tendency, and to undergo differentiation and
development parallel with the growth of imagination. Perez, speaking of
children at about the age of two months, says, “they begin to push away
objects that they do not like, and have real fits of passion, frowning,
growing red in the face, trembling all over, and sometimes shedding
tears.” They also show anger at not getting the breast or bottle, or
when washed or undressed, or when their toys are taken away. At about
one year old “they will beat people, animals, and inanimate objects if
they are angry with them,”[65] throw things at offending persons, and
the like.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account