Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
Conformity is a sort of co-operation: one of its functions is to
economize energy. The standards which it presses upon the individual are
often elaborate and valuable products of cumulative thought and
experience, and whatever imperfections they may have they are, as a
whole, an indispensable foundation for life: it is inconceivable that
anyone should dispense with them. If I imitate the dress, the manners,
the household arrangements of other people, I save so much mental energy
for other purposes. It is best that each should originate where he is
specially fitted to do so, and follow others where they are better
qualified to lead. It is said with truth that conformity is a drag upon
genius; but it is equally true and important that its general action
upon human nature is elevating. We get by it the selected and
systematized outcome of the past, and to be brought up to its standards
is a brief recapitulation of social development: it sometimes levels
down but more generally levels up. It may be well for purposes of
incitement to goad our individuality by the abuse of conformity; but
statements made with this in view lack accuracy. It is good for the
young and aspiring to read Emerson’s praise of self-reliance, in order
that they may have courage to fight for their ideas; but we may also
sympathize with Goethe when he says that “nothing more exposes us to
madness than distinguishing us from others, and nothing more contributes
to maintaining our common-sense than living in the universal way with
multitudes of men.”[75]
There are two aspects of non-conformity: first, a rebellious impulse or
“contrary suggestion” leading to an avoidance of accepted standards in a
spirit of opposition, without necessary reference to any other
standards; and, second, an appeal from present and commonplace standards
to those that are comparatively remote and unusual. These two usually
work together. One is led to a mode of life different from that of the
people about him, partly by intrinsic contrariness, and partly by fixing
his imagination on the ideas and practices of other people whose mode of
life he finds more congenial.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account