Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
In face-to-face relations, then, the natural leader is one who always
has the appearance of being master of the situation. He includes other
people and extends beyond them, and so is in a position to point out
what they must do next. Intellectually his suggestion seems to embrace
what is best in the views of others, and to embody the inevitable
conclusion; it is the timely, the fit, and so the prevalent. Emotionally
his belief is the strongest force present, and so draws other beliefs
into it. Yet, while he imposes himself upon others, he feels the other
selves as part of the situation, and so adapts himself to them that no
opposition is awakened; or possibly he may take the violent method, and
browbeat and humiliate a weak mind: there are various ways of
establishing superiority, but in one way or another the consummate
leader always accomplishes it.
Take Bismarck as an example of almost irresistible personal ascendency
in face-to-face relations. He had the advantage, which, however, many
men of equal power have done without, of an imposing bulk and stature;
but much more than this were the mental and moral traits which made him
appear the natural master in an assembly of the chief diplomats of
Europe. “No idea can be formed,” says M. de Blowitz,[83] “of the
ascendency exercised by the German Chancellor over the eminent
diplomatists attending the Congress. Prince Gortchakoff alone, eclipsed
by his rival’s greatness, tried to struggle against him.” His “great and
scornful pride,” the absolute, contemptuous assurance of superiority
which was evident in every pose, tone, and gesture, accompanied, as is
possible only to one perfectly sure of himself, by a frankness,
good-humor, and cordial insight into others which seemed to make them
one with himself, participators in his domination; together with a
penetrating intelligence, a unique and striking way of expressing
himself, and a perfect clearness of purpose at all times, were among the
elements of the effect he produced. He conciliated those whom he thought
it worth while to conciliate, and browbeat, ignored, or ridiculed the
rest. There was nothing a rival could say or do but Bismarck, if he
chose, would say or do something which made it appear a failure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account