Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
Idealization, of this or any other sort, is not to be thought of as
sharply marked off from experience and memory. It seems probable that
the mind is never indifferent to the elements presented to it, but that
its very nature is to select, arrange, harmonize, idealize. That is, the
whole is always acting upon the parts, tending to make them one with
itself. What we call distinctively an ideal is only a relatively complex
and finished product of this activity. The past, as it lives in our
minds, is never a mere repetition of old experience, but is always
colored by our present feeling, is always idealized in some sense; and
it is the same with our anticipation of the future, so that to wholesome
thought expectation is hope. Thus the mind is ever an artist,
re-creating things in a manner congenial to itself, and special arts are
only a more deliberate expression of a general tendency.
An ideal, then, is a somewhat definite and felicitous product of
imagination, a harmonious and congenial reconstruction of the elements
of experience. And a personal ideal is such a harmonious and congenial
reconstruction of our experience of persons. Its active function is to
symbolize and define the desirable, and by so doing to make it the
object of definite endeavor. The ideal of goodness is only the next step
beyond the good man of experience, and performs the same energizing
office. Indeed, as I have already pointed out, there is no separation
between actual and ideal persons, only a more or less definite
connection of personal ideas with material bodies.
There are all degrees of vagueness or definition in our personal ideals.
They may be no more than scattered imaginings of traits which we have
met in experience and felt to be worthy; or they may assume such fulness
and cohesion as to be distinct ideal persons. There may even be several
personal ideals; one may cherish one ideal of himself and a different
one for each of his intimate friends; or his imagination may project
several ideals of himself, to correspond to various phases of his
development.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account