Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
According to Mr. Tylor,[11] fasting, solitude, and physical exhaustion
by dancing, shouting, or flagellation are very generally employed by
savage peoples to bring on abnormal states of mind of which
suggestibility—the sleep of choice, and control by some idea from the
subconscious life—is always a trait. The visions and ecstasies following
the fastings, watchings, and flagellations of Christian devotees of an
earlier time seem to belong, psychologically, in much the same category.
It is well known that suggestibility is limited by habit, or, more
accurately stated, that habit is itself a perennial source of
suggestions that set bounds and conditions upon the power of fresh
suggestions. A total abstainer will resist the suggestion to drink, a
modest person will refuse to do anything indecent, and so on. People are
least liable to yield to irrational suggestions, to be stampeded with
the crowd, in matters with which they are familiar, so that they have
habits regarding them. The soldier, in his place in the ranks and with
his captain in sight, will march forward to certain death, very likely
without any acute emotion whatever, simply because he has the habits
that constitute discipline; and so with firemen, policemen, sailors,
brakemen, physicians, and many others who learn to deal with life and
death as calmly as they read a newspaper. It is all in the day’s work.
As regards the greater or less suggestibility of different persons there
is, of course, no distinct line between the normal and the abnormal; it
is simply a matter of the greater or less efficiency of the higher
mental organization. Most people, perhaps, are so far suggestible that
they make no energetic and persistent attempt to interpret in any broad
way the elements of life accessible to them, but receive the stamp of
some rather narrow and simple class of suggestions to which their
allegiance is yielded. There are innumerable people of much energy but
sluggish intellect, who will go ahead—as all who have energy must do—but
what direction they take is a matter of the opportune suggestion. The
humbler walks of religion and philanthropy, for instance, the Salvation
Army, the village prayer-meeting, and the city mission, are full of
such. They do not reason on general topics, but believe and labor. The
intellectual travail of the time does not directly touch them. At some
epoch in the past, perhaps in some hour of emotional exaltation,
something was printed on their minds to remain there till death, and be
read and followed daily. To the philosopher such people are fanatics;
but their function is as important as his. They are repositories of
moral energy—which he is very likely to lack—they are the people who
brought in Christianity and have kept it going ever since. And this is
only one of many comparatively automatic types of mankind. Rationality,
in the sense of a patient and open-minded attempt to think out the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account